197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23255545)
1. Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.
McGowan SE; Burnet NG; Lomax AJ
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20120288. PubMed ID: 23255545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
An Y; Liang J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28044325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations for shoot-through FLASH proton therapy.
Verhaegen F; Wanders RG; Wolfs C; Eekers D
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):06NT01. PubMed ID: 33571981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization.
Unkelbach J; Paganetti H
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 28(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 29735195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proton therapy - Present and future.
Mohan R; Grosshans D
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2017 Jan; 109():26-44. PubMed ID: 27919760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation.
Korevaar EW; Habraken SJM; Scandurra D; Kierkels RGJ; Unipan M; Eenink MGC; Steenbakkers RJHM; Peeters SG; Zindler JD; Hoogeman M; Langendijk JA
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():267-274. PubMed ID: 31492443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Robust treatment planning in proton therapy].
Sterpin E; Barragan A; Souris K; Lee JA
Cancer Radiother; 2016 Oct; 20(6-7):523-9. PubMed ID: 27614528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intensity modulated x-ray therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy for selective subvolume boosting: a phantom study.
Flynn RT; Barbee DL; Mackie TR; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6073-91. PubMed ID: 17921573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.
Liu W; Li Y; Li X; Cao W; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3089-101. PubMed ID: 22755694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties.
Park PC; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Sahoo N; Melancon AD; Zhang L; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e329-36. PubMed ID: 21703781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A robust optimisation approach accounting for the effect of fractionation on setup uncertainties.
Lowe M; Aitkenhead A; Albertini F; Lomax AJ; MacKay RI
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(20):8178-8196. PubMed ID: 28901947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Highly Conformal Craniospinal Radiotherapy Techniques Can Underdose the Cranial Clinical Target Volume if Leptomeningeal Extension through Skull Base Exit Foramina is not Contoured.
Noble DJ; Ajithkumar T; Lambert J; Gleeson I; Williams MV; Jefferies SJ
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jul; 29(7):439-447. PubMed ID: 28318880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of proton therapy and IMRT treatment plans for prostate radiotherapy.
Dowdell SJ; Metcalfe PE; Morales JE; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
