These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23256122)
1. Optical colonoscopy and virtual colonoscopy numbers after initiation of a CT colonography program: long term data. Benson M; Pier J; Kraft S; Kim D; Pickhardt P; Weiss J; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau P J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2012 Dec; 21(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 23256122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a CT colonography screening program on endoscopic colonoscopy in clinical practice. Schwartz DC; Dasher KJ; Said A; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Pfau PR Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 17941961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Plumb AA; Halligan S; Nickerson C; Bassett P; Goddard AF; Taylor SA; Patnick J; Burling D Gut; 2014 Jun; 63(6):964-73. PubMed ID: 23955527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT Colonographic Screening of Patients With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Adults at Average Risk and Implications for Guidelines. Pickhardt PJ; Mbah I; Pooler BD; Chen OT; Hinshaw JL; Weiss JM; Kim DH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):794-800. PubMed ID: 28125785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of prior colonic imaging on endoscopic productivity: potential impact of computed tomographic colonography. Hur C; Gazelle GS; Hsu EH; Halpern EF; Podolsky DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):1124-7. PubMed ID: 16271344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence? Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of CT colonography utilization among asymptomatic medicare beneficiaries. Zafar HM; Yang J; Harhay M; Lev-Toaff A; Armstrong K J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Sep; 28(9):1208-14. PubMed ID: 23539282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas. Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduced and Full-Preparation CT Colonography, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Colonoscopy for Population Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Sali L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Ventura L; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Delsanto S; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Feb; 108(2):. PubMed ID: 26719225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Hur C; Gazelle GS; Zalis ME; Podolsky DK Gastroenterology; 2004 Nov; 127(5):1312-21. PubMed ID: 15521000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial. van Dam L; de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Thomeer M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; Stoker J; Dekker E; Steyerberg EW Endoscopy; 2013; 45(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 23446667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery. Weinberg DS; Pickhardt PJ; Bruining DH; Edwards K; Fletcher JG; Gollub MJ; Keenan EM; Kupfer SS; Li T; Lubner SJ; Markowitz AJ; Ross EA Gastroenterology; 2018 Mar; 154(4):927-934.e4. PubMed ID: 29174927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the participation rate between CT colonography and colonoscopy in screening population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhu H; Li F; Tao K; Wang J; Scurlock C; Zhang X; Xu H Br J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 93(1105):20190240. PubMed ID: 31651188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis. El-Maraghi RH; Kielar AZ Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 19345897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography. Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Schembre DB; Ayub K; Gluck M; Cantone N; Soon MS; Dominitz JA Gastroenterology; 2006 Oct; 131(4):1011-9. PubMed ID: 17030171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening. Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Hoff G; Kay CL Endoscopy; 2007 Jun; 39(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 17554653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy. Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should computed tomographic colonography replace optical colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer? Veerappan GR; Cash BD Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2009 Apr; 119(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 19413183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: national survey of current practice. Plumb AA; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Nickerson C; Patnick J Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 23245277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]