385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23256562)
1. A direct sensitivity approach to predict hourly ozone resulting from compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard.
Simon H; Baker KR; Akhtar F; Napelenok SL; Possiel N; Wells B; Timin B
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2304-13. PubMed ID: 23256562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling an air pollution episode in northwestern United States: identifying the effect of nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compound emission changes on air pollutants formation using direct sensitivity analysis.
Tsimpidi AP; Trail M; Hu Y; Nenes A; Russell AG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1150-65. PubMed ID: 23155861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PRCI ambient NO
Panek JA; McCarthy JM; Huth AZ; Krol AJ; Nowak C
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):504-521. PubMed ID: 32186474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Projected ozone trends and changes in the ozone-precursor relationship in the South Coast Air Basin in response to varying reductions of precursor emissions.
Fujita EM; Campbell DE; Stockwell WR; Saunders E; Fitzgerald R; Perea R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 26514212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9-12, 2015.
Dreessen J; Sullivan J; Delgado R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):842-62. PubMed ID: 26963934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the manageable portion of ground-level ozone in the contiguous United States.
Luo H; Astitha M; Rao ST; Hogrefe C; Mathur R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Nov; 70(11):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 32749924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contributions of regional air pollutant emissions to ozone and fine particulate matter-related mortalities in eastern U.S. urban areas.
Hou X; Strickland MJ; Liao KJ
Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():475-84. PubMed ID: 25701729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precursor reductions and ground-level ozone in the Continental United States.
Hidy GM; Blanchard CL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Oct; 65(10):1261-82. PubMed ID: 26252366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeled response of ozone to electricity generation emissions in the northeastern United States using three sensitivity techniques.
Couzo E; McCann J; Vizuete W; Blumsack S; West JJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 May; 66(5):456-69. PubMed ID: 26796121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation and application of sub-grid-scale plume treatment in the latest version of EPA's third-generation air quality model, CMAQ 5.01.
Karamchandani P; Johnson J; Yarwood G; Knipping E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Apr; 64(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 24843916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States.
Hakami A; Seinfeld JH; Chai T; Tang Y; Carmichael GR; Sandu A
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3855-64. PubMed ID: 16830553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Future year ozone source attribution modeling study using CMAQ-ISAM.
Collet S; Kidokoro T; Karamchandani P; Jung J; Shah T
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 29999477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United States.
McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT; Brown N; Jacob DJ; Jaffe D; Kolb CE; Lefohn AS; Oltmans S; Parrish DD; Yarwood G; Zhang L
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 45(22):9484-97. PubMed ID: 21985705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: a case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States.
Bell ML
Environ Int; 2006 Jul; 32(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 16516968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Updating the SAPRC Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) scale for the United States from 1988 to 2010.
Venecek MA; Carter WPL; Kleeman MJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Dec; 68(12):1301-1316. PubMed ID: 29993352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis of ground-level ozone concentration to emission changes in two urban regions of southeast Texas.
Lin CJ; Ho TC; Chu HW; Yang H; Chandru S; Krishnarajanagar N; Chiou P; Hopper JR
J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 15854725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
