148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23257056)
1. Comparative case study investigating sociotechnical processes of change in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
Cresswell KM; Worth A; Sheikh A
Health Informatics J; 2012 Dec; 18(4):251-70. PubMed ID: 23257056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Organizational learning in the implementation and adoption of national electronic health records: case studies of two hospitals participating in the National Programme for Information Technology in England.
Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 25183608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
Takian A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefiting from ambulatory EHR implementation: solidarity, six sigma, and willingness to strive.
Zaroukian MH; Sierra A
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 16429959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation.
Bloom MV; Huntington MK
Fam Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 20830621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What can the American electronic health record (EHR) pioneers tell us about what it takes to be successful?
Protti D
Healthc Manage Forum; 2002; 15(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 12078354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
Tjora AH; Scambler G
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study.
Scott JT; Rundall TG; Vogt TM; Hsu J
BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7528):1313-6. PubMed ID: 16269467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals.
Aarts J; Berg M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):999-1002. PubMed ID: 15360962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized patient records aren't much good if doctors don't use them. Here's how one hospital got its physicians online.
Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Jul; 11(7):7-10. PubMed ID: 10185070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals.
Sheikh A; Cornford T; Barber N; Avery A; Takian A; Lichtner V; Petrakaki D; Crowe S; Marsden K; Robertson A; Morrison Z; Klecun E; Prescott R; Quinn C; Jani Y; Ficociello M; Voutsina K; Paton J; Fernando B; Jacklin A; Cresswell K
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6054. PubMed ID: 22006942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic medical records: a 'workflow' in progress.
Briggs B
Health Data Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(6):64-9. PubMed ID: 12078398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling and implementing electronic health records in Denmark.
Bernstein K; Bruun-Rasmussen M; Vingtoft S; Andersen SK; Nøhr C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():245-50. PubMed ID: 14663994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staffing angst. Resistance to change continues to be among the leading challenges for care providers planning to improve patient safety records.
Marietti C
Healthc Inform; 2007 Sep; 24(9):64. PubMed ID: 17927072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitness for purpose when there are many different purposes: who are electronic patient records for?
Eason K; Waterson P
Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 24282190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England.
Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Dec; 12():484. PubMed ID: 23272770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study.
Hendy J; Reeves BC; Fulop N; Hutchings A; Masseria C
BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):331-6. PubMed ID: 16081447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network.
McAlearney AS; Robbins J; Hirsch A; Jorina M; Harrop JP
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Dec; 79(12):807-16. PubMed ID: 20961803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
