These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23257282)

  • 1. Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study.
    Foulsham T; Gray A; Nasiopoulos E; Kingstone A
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 78():14-25. PubMed ID: 23257282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance.
    Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J
    Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.
    Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection.
    Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Line bisection in simulated homonymous hemianopia.
    Mitra AR; Abegg M; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1742-9. PubMed ID: 20188749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of saccades and response type on the Simon effect: if you look at the stimulus, the Simon effect may be gone.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2172-89. PubMed ID: 20526979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception.
    Castelhano MS; Mack ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):6.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements.
    Doricchi F; Guariglia P; Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Bruno G; Gasparini M
    Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1386-406. PubMed ID: 15758037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):426-33. PubMed ID: 17931670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
    Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
    Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of local and global processing demands on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Oct; 59(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 16019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiencing simultanagnosia through windowed viewing of complex social scenes.
    Dalrymple KA; Birmingham E; Bischof WF; Barton JJ; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():265-77. PubMed ID: 20950591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the origin of the hemianopic line bisection error purely visual? Evidence from eye movements in simulated hemianopia.
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1668-80. PubMed ID: 19362571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial frequency processing in the central and peripheral visual field during scene viewing.
    Cajar A; Engbert R; Laubrock J
    Vision Res; 2016 Oct; 127():186-197. PubMed ID: 27491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does image noise affect actual and predicted human gaze allocation in assessing image quality?
    Röhrbein F; Goddard P; Schneider M; James G; Guo K
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():11-25. PubMed ID: 25982711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.