BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23257473)

  • 1. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system: 1. Accuracy of cast orientation.
    Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22047955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
    Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Forrest KK; Camp B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):635-40; discussion 640-1. PubMed ID: 11381385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
    Anusha CV; Singh AA; Sam G; Sangwan B; Shilpa M; Kamath AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
    Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result.
    Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cast positions by using four face-bows.
    Goska JR; Christensen LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jan; 59(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 3422301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems.
    Maveli TC; Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Bahjri K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 26139043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
    Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
    Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system. 2. Accuracy of occlusal wafers.
    Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22047954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.