These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23257578)

  • 1. Noise and communication: a three-year update.
    Brammer AJ; Laroche C
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):281-6. PubMed ID: 23257578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].
    Matschke RG
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Electronic noise compensation for improving speech discrimination in airplane pilots].
    Matschke RG; Pösselt C; Veit I; Andresen U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Feb; 68(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 2706059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Protection for noise-induced hearing loss using active hearing protection systems].
    Matschke RG; Lehnert H; Veit I; Andresen U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Nov; 70(11):586-93. PubMed ID: 1755896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of a headset leakage on speech intelligibility in helicopter noise.
    Wagstaff AS; Tvete O; Ludvigsen B
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 8908340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Progressive noise induced hearing loss caused by hearing AIDS, a dilemma for the worker and the expert alike].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Dec; 80(12):740-2. PubMed ID: 11793272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise in open plan classrooms in primary schools: a review.
    Shield B; Greenland E; Dockrell J
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):225-34. PubMed ID: 20871177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The determination of the criteria for selecting and using personal means of acoustic protection].
    Merluzzi F; Di Credico N
    Med Lav; 1993; 84(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 8316146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
    Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Feletti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.