These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23257585)

  • 21. Effects of prior exposure to office noise and music on aspects of working memory.
    Smith A; Waters B; Jones H
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):235-43. PubMed ID: 20871178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children.
    Klatte M; Meis M; Sukowski H; Schick A
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(36):64-74. PubMed ID: 18025757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.
    Neath I; Farley LA; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1269-78; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech.
    Sörqvist P; Nöstl A; Halin N
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22283509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of irrelevant speech on physiological stress, cognitive performance, and subjective experience - Focus on heart rate variability.
    Radun J; Maula H; Tervahartiala IK; Rajala V; Schlittmeier S; Hongisto V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jun; 200():112352. PubMed ID: 38641017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity?
    Sörqvist P; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 22199182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Acoustic conditions in open plan office - Application of technical measures in a typical room].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2018 Mar; 69(2):153-165. PubMed ID: 29521377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter?
    Van Gerven PW; Murphy DR
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2010 Nov; 65(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 20624760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of rehearsal in a novel call center-type task.
    Perham N; Banbury S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):1-5. PubMed ID: 22387706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.