These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23258615)
1. Editorial. Chasin M; Hockley N Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):135. PubMed ID: 23258615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Music and hearing aids--an introduction. Chasin M Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments. Hockley NS; Bahlmann F; Fulton B Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 23258618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Musicians and hearing aid design--is your hearing instrument being overworked? Schmidt M Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 23258617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music. Moore BC Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observations from a musician with hearing loss. Einhorn R Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 23203415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids. Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Music and hearing aids. Madsen SM; Moore BC Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25361601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs. Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain. Zakis JA; Fulton B; Steele BR Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):906-13. PubMed ID: 23025794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Ewert SD; Oetting D Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters. Anderson M; Rallapalli V; Schoof T; Souza P; Arehart K Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):809-815. PubMed ID: 30052097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Kirchberger M; Russo FA Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26868955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment. Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment. Johnson EE Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting. van Beurden M; Boymans M; van Geleuken M; Oetting D; Kollmeier B; Dreschler WA Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805690. PubMed ID: 30353784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids. Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]