These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23258615)

  • 21. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sound fields in complex listening environments.
    Vorländer M
    Trends Amplif; 2011 Sep; 15(3):106-15. PubMed ID: 21676999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.
    Sullivan JR; Thibodeau LM; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 23297921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.
    Landsberger D; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1559-66. PubMed ID: 21895094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
    Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 22143874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.
    Chatterjee M; Oberzut C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1567-80. PubMed ID: 21895095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing.
    Jürgens T; Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Meddis R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 26918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.
    Stone MA; Anton K; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids.
    Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Dillon H; Carter L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 21303017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.
    Nelson DA; Kreft HA; Anderson ES; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3916-33. PubMed ID: 21682414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kreisman BM; Mazevski AG; Schum DJ; Sockalingam R
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 20457725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding pitch contours using current steering.
    Luo X; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Srinivasan AG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1215-23. PubMed ID: 20815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.