These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23259756)

  • 1. Cluster analysis application identifies muscle characteristics of importance for beef tenderness.
    Chriki S; Gardner GE; Jurie C; Picard B; Micol D; Brun JP; Journaux L; Hocquette JF
    BMC Biochem; 2012 Dec; 13():29. PubMed ID: 23259756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data from the Farmgate-to-Meat Continuum Including Omics-Based Biomarkers to Better Understand the Variability of Beef Tenderness: An Integromics Approach.
    Gagaoua M; Monteils V; Picard B
    J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Dec; 66(51):13552-13563. PubMed ID: 30512949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: Sampling methodology for relating sarcomere length, collagen concentration, and the extent of postmortem proteolysis to beef and pork longissimus tenderness.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Apr; 80(4):982-7. PubMed ID: 12002335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of connective tissue components, muscle fibres and marbling to beef tenderness variability in longissimus thoracis, rectus abdominis, semimembranosus and semitendinosus muscles.
    Listrat A; Gagaoua M; Normand J; Gruffat D; Andueza D; Mairesse G; Mourot BP; Chesneau G; Gobert C; Picard B
    J Sci Food Agric; 2020 Apr; 100(6):2502-2511. PubMed ID: 31960978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles.
    Rhee MS; Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):534-50. PubMed ID: 14974553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The GENOTEND chip: a new tool to analyse gene expression in muscles of beef cattle for beef quality prediction.
    Hocquette JF; Bernard-Capel C; Vidal V; Jesson B; Levéziel H; Renand G; Cassar-Malek I
    BMC Vet Res; 2012 Aug; 8():135. PubMed ID: 22894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and partial least square regression on crossbreed Angus-Nellore bulls feedlot finished.
    Lopes LSF; Ferreira MS; Baldassini WA; Curi RA; Pereira GL; Machado Neto OR; Oliveira HN; Silva JAIV; Munari DP; Chardulo LAL
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Nov; 52(6):3655-3664. PubMed ID: 32960399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tandem mass tag labeling to assess proteome differences between intermediate and very tender beef steaks.
    Dang DS; Zhai C; Nair MN; Thornton KJ; Sawalhah MN; Matarneh SK
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Aug; 100(8):. PubMed ID: 35908783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship of beef longissimus tenderness classes to tenderness of gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Nov; 78(11):2856-61. PubMed ID: 11063309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships between the assessment of "grain of meat" and meat tenderness of Charolais cattle.
    Ellies-Oury MP; Durand Y; Delamarche F; Jouanno M; Lambert J; Micol D; Dumont R
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 23273442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tenderness classification of beef: III. Effect of the interaction between end point temperature and tenderness on Warner-Bratzler shear force of beef longissimus.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Feb; 77(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 10100669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of cattle inter-individual cluster variability: the potential of continuum data from the farm-to-fork for ultimate beef tenderness management.
    Gagaoua M; Picard B; Monteils V
    J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jun; 99(8):4129-4141. PubMed ID: 30767219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
    Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beef palatability and its relationship with protein degradation and muscle fibre type profile in longissimus thoracis in Alentejana breed from divergent growth pathways.
    Costa P; Simões JA; Alves SP; Lemos JP; Alfaia CM; Lopes PA; Prates JA; Hocquette JF; Calkins CR; Vleck V; Bessa RJ
    Animal; 2017 Jan; 11(1):175-182. PubMed ID: 27378519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proteomics Unveils Post-Mortem Changes in Beef Muscle Proteins and Provides Insight into Variations in Meat Quality Traits of Crossbred Young Steers and Heifers Raised in Feedlot.
    Severino M; Gagaoua M; Baldassini W; Ribeiro R; Torrecilhas J; Pereira G; Curi R; Chardulo LA; Padilha P; Neto OM
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Oct; 23(20):. PubMed ID: 36293120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy and repeatability of untrained laboratory consumer panelists in detecting differences in beef longissimus tenderness.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 14974555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships among glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability.
    Wulf DM; Emnett RS; Leheska JM; Moeller SJ
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jul; 80(7):1895-903. PubMed ID: 12162657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of proteomic to investigate the different degrees of meat tenderness in Nellore breed.
    Malheiros JM; Enríquez-Valencia CE; Braga CP; Vieira JCS; Vieira DS; Pereira GL; Curi RA; Neto ORM; Oliveira HN; Padilha PM; Chardulo LAL
    J Proteomics; 2021 Sep; 248():104331. PubMed ID: 34303863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profile of biochemical traits influencing tenderness of muscles from the beef round.
    Anderson MJ; Lonergan SM; Fedler CA; Prusa KJ; Binning JM; Huff-Lonergan E
    Meat Sci; 2012 Jul; 91(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 22386323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.