These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism. Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Guinzbourg BF; Vanrolleghem PA; Schippers JC Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):19-25. PubMed ID: 16003957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. Siembida B; Cornel P; Krause S; Zimmermann B Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4037-46. PubMed ID: 20617563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Domestic wastewater treatment by a submerged MBR (membrane bio-reactor) with enhanced air sparging. Chang IS; Judd SJ Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):149-54. PubMed ID: 12926682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Zsirai T; Buzatu P; Aerts P; Judd S Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(14):4499-507. PubMed ID: 22709984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thermophilic treatment of acidified and partially acidified wastewater using an anaerobic submerged MBR: Factors affecting long-term operational flux. Jeison D; van Lier JB Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3868-79. PubMed ID: 17644148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performances and fouling control of a flat sheet membrane in a MBR pilot-plant. Grélot A; Grelier P; Tazi-Pain A; Lesjean B; Brüss U; Grasmick A Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2185-92. PubMed ID: 20418613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation. Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and permeability of a dynamic membrane for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Alibardi L; Cossu R; Saleem M; Spagni A Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 161():236-44. PubMed ID: 24709537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of sparging rate on transmembrane pressure and critical flux in an AnMBR. Fox RA; Stuckey DC J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 151():280-5. PubMed ID: 25577705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Kim J; Kim K; Ye H; Lee E; Shin C; McCarty PL; Bae J Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):576-81. PubMed ID: 21158433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of permeate flux and gas sparging rate on membrane performance and process economics of granular anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Vinardell S; Sanchez L; Astals S; Mata-Alvarez J; Dosta J; Heran M; Lesage G Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153907. PubMed ID: 35183622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced membrane bioreactor process without chemical cleaning. Krause S; Zimmermann B; Meyer-Blumenroth U; Lamparter W; Siembida B; Cornel P Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2575-80. PubMed ID: 20453330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]