BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23260629)

  • 21. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
    Callaway E
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited.
    Campanario JM
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):288. PubMed ID: 11099018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.
    Sharp DW
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 1860767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Journals question integrity of almost 200 papers by Japanese anaesthetist.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2490. PubMed ID: 22474308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Researcher didn't get ethical approval for 68 studies, investigators say.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d833. PubMed ID: 21300720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reporting research, retraction of results, and responsibility.
    Tobin MJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2000 Sep; 162(3 Pt 1):773-4. PubMed ID: 10988078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
    Kvaal SI
    J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A flagrant case of scientific fraud].
    Fernández Mondéjar E; Ceraso H
    Med Intensiva; 2011; 35(6):323-7. PubMed ID: 21733597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
    Couzin J; Unger K
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Plagiarism is the emerged part of scientific misconduct].
    Maisonneuve H
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23246179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Universite de Montréal in the dark about fraud.
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2005 May; 172(10):1278. PubMed ID: 15883394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.
    Service RF
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Foibles and peccadillos in the research environment.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2012; 41(4):147. PubMed ID: 23224279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
    Miller G
    Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.