264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23261096)
1. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.
Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.
Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men.
Coe SG; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 23375528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas.
Yang MH; Son HJ; Lee JH; Kim MH; Kim JY; Kim YH; Chang DK; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Rhee JC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):774-81. PubMed ID: 20363417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Piette C; Bretagne JF; Perrin P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Dec; 74(6):1325-36. PubMed ID: 21958899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
