These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2326122)

  • 21. Acoustic and articulatory features of diphthong production: a speech clarity study.
    Tasko SM; Greilick K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):84-99. PubMed ID: 19948757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation?
    Connor CM; Craig HK; Raudenbush SW; Heavner K; Zwolan TA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):628-44. PubMed ID: 17086075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance by mothers of children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Ellis LW; Pakulski L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):324-8. PubMed ID: 12705540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lingual frenectomy and alveolar tap production: an acoustic and perceptual study.
    Camargo ZA; Marchesan IQ; Oliveira LR; Svicero MA; Pereira LC; Madureira S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Dec; 38(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 23826654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    Whitehead RL; Schiavetti N; MacKenzie DJ; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 15063145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of speakers' augmented characteristics and listeners' sex on intelligibility and acceptability of synthesized speech.
    Ellis LW; Spiegel B; Benjamin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1081-8. PubMed ID: 12186228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Forced-choice analysis of segmental production by Chinese-accented English speakers.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15989394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between kinematics, F2 slope and speech intelligibility in dysarthria due to cerebral palsy.
    Rong P; Loucks T; Kim H; Hasegawa-Johnson M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Sep; 26(9):806-22. PubMed ID: 22876770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of speech intelligibility: evidence from a study of the hearing impaired.
    Schiavetti N; Metz DE; Sitler RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7300287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech intelligibility of deaf speakers and distinctive feature usage.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 6543865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Criterion validity of speech intelligibility rating-scale procedures for the hearing-impaired population.
    Samar VJ; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3172748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aspects of spatio-temporal variability during consonant production by Greek speakers with hearing impairment.
    Nicolaidis K
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jun; 21(6):405-22. PubMed ID: 17516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.
    Estis JM; Parisi JA; Moore RE; Brungart DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation.
    Furia CL; Kowalski LP; Latorre MR; Angelis EC; Martins NM; Barros AP; Ribeiro KC
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Jul; 127(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 11448366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Munich Intelligibility Profile. Studies of reliability and validity].
    Ziegler W; Hartmann E
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Oct; 64(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 8232679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test-retest reliability of independent measures of phonology in the assessment of toddlers' speech.
    Morris SR
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jan; 40(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18840673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the significance of phase in the short term Fourier spectrum for speech intelligibility.
    Kazama M; Gotoh S; Tohyama M; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1432-9. PubMed ID: 20329843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.