These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23262253)

  • 21. Simulator training to automaticity leads to improved skill transfer compared with traditional proficiency-based training: a randomized controlled trial.
    Stefanidis D; Scerbo MW; Montero PN; Acker CE; Smith WD
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jan; 255(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21637099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of the response-stimulus interval on implicit and explicit learning of stimulus sequence.
    Miyawaki K
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16044316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consistent mapping and automatic visual search: comparing persons with and without intellectual disability.
    Merrill EC
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Nov; 48(Pt 8):746-53. PubMed ID: 15494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.
    Ziessler M; Nattkemper D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):595-613. PubMed ID: 11394669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition.
    Cohen JR; Poldrack RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 18605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: the role of unexpected events.
    Rünger D; Frensch PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1011-26. PubMed ID: 18763888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are correlated streams of information necessary for implicit sequence learning?
    Meier B; Cock J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19717137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading?
    Georgiou GK; Parrila R; Cui Y; Papadopoulos TC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 May; 115(1):218-25. PubMed ID: 23384823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What matters in implicit task sequence learning: perceptual stimulus features, task sets, or correlated streams of information?
    Weiermann B; Cock J; Meier B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1492-509. PubMed ID: 21038998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.
    Abrahamse EL; van der Lubbe RH; Verwey WB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17896207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Middleton EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing assumptions of statistical learning: is it long-term and implicit?
    Kim R; Seitz A; Feenstra H; Shams L
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Sep; 461(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 19539701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of learning duration on implicit transfer.
    Tanaka K; Watanabe K
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2767-76. PubMed ID: 26070899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unintentional and intentional learning of noncorresponding stimulus-response associations in the Simon task.
    Vu KP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20605125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Context-specific control in the single-prime negative-priming procedure.
    D'Angelo MC; Milliken B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):887-910. PubMed ID: 22224855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cerebral activation related to implicit sequence learning in a Double Serial Reaction Time task.
    van der Graaf FH; Maguire RP; Leenders KL; de Jong BM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 16533501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test of a potential link between analytic and nonanalytic category learning and automatic, effortful processing.
    Tracy JI; Pinsk M; Helverson J; Urban G; Dietz T; Smith DJ
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):326-41. PubMed ID: 11487283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implicit sequence learning processes after unilateral stroke.
    Orrell AJ; Eves FF; Masters RS; MacMahon KM
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 17(3):335-54. PubMed ID: 17474060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.