165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23262380)
1. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of two prosthetic suspension systems in a bilateral transtibial amputee.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Lúvíksdóttir AG; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 91(10):894-8. PubMed ID: 22173083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative study of prosthetic suspension systems on transtibial amputees' satisfaction and perceived problems with their prosthetic devices.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Naqshbandi MM; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Gholizadeh H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):1919-23. PubMed ID: 22579945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 liners: effect on patient's satisfaction and perceived problems.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Arifin N; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Abas WA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():769810. PubMed ID: 25184154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Satisfaction and problems experienced with wrist movements: comparison between a common body-powered prosthesis and a new biomechatronics prosthesis.
Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Kamyab M; Wan Abas WA; Gholizadeh H
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 93(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 24429510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
Baars EC; Geertzen JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94520. PubMed ID: 24827560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems: a systematic review of the literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 93(9):809-23. PubMed ID: 24743451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.
Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses.
Van de Meent H; Hopman MT; Frölke JP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2174-8. PubMed ID: 23774380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of method to quantify transtibial amputees' free-living prosthetic wearing times and physical activity levels when using suction suspension sockets.
Tang KT; Spence WD; Maxwell D; Stansfield BW
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 22773201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
