153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23263834)
1. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.
Lamo-Espinosa J; Duart Clemente J; Díaz-Rada P; Pons-Villanueva J; Valentí-Nín JR
Musculoskelet Surg; 2013 Apr; 97(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 23263834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study.
Coscujuela-Mañá A; Angles F; Tramunt C; Casanova X
Hip Int; 2010; 20 Suppl 7():S112-8. PubMed ID: 20512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years.
Wachtl SW; Jung M; Jakob RP; Gautier E
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):959-63. PubMed ID: 11112187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.
Xiao Q; Wang H; Zhou K; Wang D; Ling T; Pei F; Zhou Z
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 31699067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Bortolami O; Bartolozzi P
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1057-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22397857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.
Malahias MA; Sarantis M; Gkiatas I; Jang SJ; Gu A; Thorey F; Alexiades MM; Nikolaou VS
Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):705-715. PubMed ID: 35658595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Pieringer H; Auersperg V; Böhler N
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 16781399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review.
Aprato A; Olivero M; Branca Vergano L; Massè A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Jan; 90(1-S):24-31. PubMed ID: 30714995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of type III and type IVB acetabular defects with Burch-Schneider anti-Protrusio cages.
Ilyas I; Alrumaih HA; Kashif S; Rabbani SA; Faqihi AH
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 25280395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.
Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.
Jones L; Grammatopoulos G; Singer G
Hip Int; 2012; 22(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22383324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.
Gaiani L; Bertelli R; Palmonari M; Vicenzi G
Chir Organi Mov; 2009 May; 93(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 19711157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary total hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages for acetabular fractures.
Liaw F; Govilkar S; Banks D; Kankanalu P; Youssef B; Lim J
Hip Int; 2022 May; 32(3):401-406. PubMed ID: 32905712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-Term Results of Graft Augmentation Prosthesis II Cage and Impacted Allograft Bone in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
Hosny HAH; El-Bakoury A; Fekry H; Keenan J
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1487-1493. PubMed ID: 29310917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
Makita H; Kerboull M; Inaba Y; Tezuka T; Saito T; Kerboull L
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
Gibon E; Barut N; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
