These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23264808)

  • 1. Establishing equivalence or non-inferiority in clinical trials: part 20 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
    Wellek S; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Oct; 109(41):674-9. PubMed ID: 23264808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's new in trial design: propensity scores, equivalence, and non-inferiority.
    Myles PS
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2009 Dec; 41(4):P6-10. PubMed ID: 20092080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical methods for the analysis of two-arm non-inferiority trials with binary outcomes.
    Wellek S
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):48-61; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalence concepts in clinical trials.
    Steinijans VW; Neuhäuser M; Bretz F
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2000; 25(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 11032089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
    Hirotsu C
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods.
    Chan IS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 12617507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.
    Goeman JJ; Solari A; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2117-25. PubMed ID: 20658478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Methodology for superiority versus equivalence and non-inferior clinical studies. A practical review].
    Rosas-Peralta M; Santos-Martínez LE; Magaña-Serrano JA; Valencia-Sánchez JS; Garrido-Garduño M; Pérez-Rodríguez G
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2016; 54(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 27100981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Monden R; Tendeiro JN; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30925900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missing data handling in non-inferiority and equivalence trials: A systematic review.
    Rabe BA; Day S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):477-488. PubMed ID: 29797777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Flight L; Julious SA
    Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 26604186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Non-inferiority trial used in venous thromboembolic disease. A warily interpretation is necessary!].
    Pérard L; Hot A; Cucherat M; Simon M; Desmurs H; Coppéré B; Girard-Madoux MH; Boissel JP; Ninet J
    Rev Med Interne; 2007 Nov; 28(11):731-6. PubMed ID: 17597259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Non-inferiority and equivalence trials: Key methodological issues].
    Herr M; Descatha A; Aegerter P
    Rev Med Interne; 2018 May; 39(5):352-359. PubMed ID: 28693836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical issues in equivalence trials.
    Ebbutt AF; Frith L
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1691-701. PubMed ID: 9749440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice of delta: requirements and reality--results of a systematic review.
    Lange S; Freitag G
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):12-27; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological standards in non-inferiority AIDS trials: moving from adherence to compliance.
    Parienti JJ; Verdon R; Massari V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():46. PubMed ID: 16987409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current issues in clinical equivalence trials.
    Blackwelder WC
    J Dent Res; 2004; 83 Spec No C():C113-5. PubMed ID: 15286135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and statistical issues in therapeutic equivalence trials.
    Garbe E; Röhmel J; Gundert-Remy U
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1993; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8405023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.