930 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23265345)
1. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography.
Berman DS; Maddahi J; Tamarappoo BK; Czernin J; Taillefer R; Udelson JE; Gibson CM; Devine M; Lazewatsky J; Bhat G; Washburn D
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 23265345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease.
Maddahi J; Lazewatsky J; Udelson JE; Berman DS; Beanlands RSB; Heller GV; Bateman TM; Knuuti J; Orlandi C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 76(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 32703509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flurpiridaz F-18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
Maddahi J; Agostini D; Bateman TM; Bax JJ; Beanlands RSB; Berman DS; Dorbala S; Garcia EV; Feldman J; Heller GV; Knuuti JM; Martinez-Clark P; Pelletier-Galarneau M; Shepple B; Tamaki N; Tranquart F; Udelson JE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Oct; 82(16):1598-1610. PubMed ID: 37821170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the
Packard RRS; Lazewatsky JL; Orlandi C; Maddahi J
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):849-854. PubMed ID: 33246979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing myocardial perfusion in suspected coronary artery disease: rationale and design of the second phase 3, open-label multi-center study of flurpiridaz (F-18) injection for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
Bourque JM; Hanson CA; Agostini D; Bateman TM; Bax JJ; Beanlands RSB; Berman DS; Garcia EV; Heller GV; Knuuti J; Tamaki N; Udelson JE; Maddahi J
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 33521873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-efficiency SPECT MPI: comparison of automated quantification, visual interpretation, and coronary angiography.
Duvall WL; Slomka PJ; Gerlach JR; Sweeny JM; Baber U; Croft LB; Guma KA; George T; Henzlova MJ
J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 20(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 23737160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.
Bateman TM; Heller GV; McGhie AI; Friedman JD; Case JA; Bryngelson JR; Hertenstein GK; Moutray KL; Reid K; Cullom SJ
J Nucl Cardiol; 2006; 13(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 16464714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Acquired Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.
Arbab-Zadeh A; Di Carli MF; Cerci R; George RT; Chen MY; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Vavere AL; Betoko A; Plotkin M; Cox C; Clouse ME; Arai AE; Rochitte CE; Lima JA; Brinker J; Miller JM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):e003533. PubMed ID: 26467105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study.
Senior R; Moreo A; Gaibazzi N; Agati L; Tiemann K; Shivalkar B; von Bardeleben S; Galiuto L; Lardoux H; Trocino G; Carrió I; Le Guludec D; Sambuceti G; Becher H; Colonna P; Ten Cate F; Bramucci E; Cohen A; Bezante G; Aggeli C; Kasprzak JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(15):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary arteriography in the diagnosis results and prognosis analysis of suspected coronary artery disease in patients with normal SPET myocardial perfusion imaging.
Yuan JW; Wang YT; Lu CZ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 26637500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The next generation of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging agents: discovery of flurpiridaz F-18 for detection of coronary disease.
Yu M; Nekolla SG; Schwaiger M; Robinson SP
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Jul; 41(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 21624564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.
Nasis A; Ko BS; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Nandurkar D; Wong DT; Kyi L; Cameron JD; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1812-21. PubMed ID: 23430194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress thallium-201/rest technetium-99m sequential dual-isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging validation versus invasive coronary angiography.
Barone-Rochette G; Leclere M; Calizzano A; Vautrin E; Céline GC; Broisat A; Ghezzi C; Baguet JP; Machecourt J; Vanzetto G; Fagret D
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 22(3):513-22. PubMed ID: 25381092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between severity of coronary artery stenosis and perfusion defect assessed by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Zaman MM; Haque SS; Siddique MA; Banerjee S; Ahmed CM; Sharma AK; Rahman MF; Haque MH; Joarder AI; Sultan AU; Fatema K
Mymensingh Med J; 2010 Oct; 19(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 20956907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-speed myocardial perfusion imaging initial clinical comparison with conventional dual detector anger camera imaging.
Sharir T; Ben-Haim S; Merzon K; Prochorov V; Dickman D; Ben-Haim S; Berman DS
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19356422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-center, multi-vendor validation of deep learning-based attenuation correction in SPECT MPI: data from the international flurpiridaz-301 trial.
Hagio T; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Renaud JM; Pierce L; Buckley C; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1028-1033. PubMed ID: 36401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography.
Husmann L; Wiegand M; Valenta I; Gaemperli O; Schepis T; Siegrist PT; Namdar M; Wyss CA; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jun; 24(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 18158612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
Song YB; Arbab-Zadeh A; Matheson MB; Ostovaneh MR; Vavere AL; Dewey M; Rochitte C; Niinuma H; Laham R; Schuijf JD; Cox C; Brinker J; di Carli M; Lima JAC; Miller JM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007720. PubMed ID: 30764641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study.
Rochitte CE; George RT; Chen MY; Arbab-Zadeh A; Dewey M; Miller JM; Niinuma H; Yoshioka K; Kitagawa K; Nakamori S; Laham R; Vavere AL; Cerci RJ; Mehra VC; Nomura C; Kofoed KF; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S; de Roos A; Laule M; Tan SY; Hoe J; Paul N; Rybicki FJ; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Cox C; Clouse ME; Di Carli MF; Lima JA
Eur Heart J; 2014 May; 35(17):1120-30. PubMed ID: 24255127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
