367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23265593)
1. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critical care environment.
Busse L; Davison DL; Junker C; Chawla LS
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2013 Jan; 20(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 23265593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging trends in minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimization of fluid therapy.
Benington S; Ferris P; Nirmalan M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):893-905. PubMed ID: 19667998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution and current use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring for predicting volume responsiveness during resuscitation, perioperative, and critical care.
Manoach S; Weingart SD; Charchaflieh J
J Clin Anesth; 2012 May; 24(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 22537573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.
Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: spanning the range of kidney function.
Davison DL; Patel K; Chawla LS
Am J Kidney Dis; 2012 May; 59(5):715-23. PubMed ID: 22386582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic monitoring.
Bigatello LM; George E
Minerva Anestesiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 12024086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Esophageal echo-Doppler monitoring in burn shock resuscitation: are hemodynamic variables the critical standard guiding fluid therapy?
Wang GY; Ma B; Tang HT; Zhu SH; Lu J; Wei W; Ge SD; Xia ZF
J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1396-401. PubMed ID: 19077633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in burn resuscitation: shifting the focus from fluids to adequate endpoint monitoring, edema control, and adjuvant therapies.
Ahrns KS
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2004 Mar; 16(1):75-98. PubMed ID: 15062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
McGee WT
J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic optimization of sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion.
Zanotti Cavazzoni SL; Dellinger RP
Crit Care; 2006; 10 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2. PubMed ID: 17164014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of cardiovascular parameters in burn patients using arterial waveform analysis: a review.
Lavrentieva A; Palmieri T
Burns; 2011 Mar; 37(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 21130581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical issues of hemodynamic monitoring at the bedside.
Polanco PM; Pinsky MR
Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Dec; 86(6):1431-56. PubMed ID: 17116456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring hemodynamics: a review of current and emerging noninvasive monitoring techniques.
Johnson A; Mohajer-Esfahani M
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2014 Sep; 26(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 25169689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive monitoring.
Monnet X; Teboul JL
Crit Care Clin; 2015 Jan; 31(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 25435477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive cardiac output determination: broadening the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring.
Compton F; Schäfer JH
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2009 Mar; 13(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 19147529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations].
Mateu Campos ML; Ferrándiz Sellés A; Gruartmoner de Vera G; Mesquida Febrer J; Sabatier Cloarec C; Poveda Hernández Y; García Nogales X
Med Intensiva; 2012; 36(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 22743144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Matthay MA
Clin Chest Med; 1983 May; 4(2):233-49. PubMed ID: 6342922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using functional hemodynamic indicators to guide fluid therapy.
Bridges E
Am J Nurs; 2013 May; 113(5):42-50; quiz 52, 51. PubMed ID: 23591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
