209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23265802)
1. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration.
Hopp T; Duric N; Ruiter NV
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():170-81. PubMed ID: 25456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.
Markelj P; Tomaževič D; Likar B; Pernuš F
Med Image Anal; 2012 Apr; 16(3):642-61. PubMed ID: 20452269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Symmetric image registration.
Rogelj P; Kovacic S
Med Image Anal; 2006 Jun; 10(3):484-93. PubMed ID: 15896998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-based image registration using robust correlation coefficients.
Kim J; Fessler JA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1430-44. PubMed ID: 15554130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MIND: modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration.
Heinrich MP; Jenkinson M; Bhushan M; Matin T; Gleeson FV; Brady SM; Schnabel JA
Med Image Anal; 2012 Oct; 16(7):1423-35. PubMed ID: 22722056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammogram registration: a phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects.
Richard FJ; Bakić PR; Maidment AD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16468453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A deformable registration method for automated morphometry of MRI brain images in neuropsychiatric research.
Schwarz D; Kasparek T; Provaznik I; Jarkovsky J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Apr; 26(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 17427732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deformable registration of brain tumor images via a statistical model of tumor-induced deformation.
Mohamed A; Zacharaki EI; Shen D; Davatzikos C
Med Image Anal; 2006 Oct; 10(5):752-63. PubMed ID: 16860588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic segmentation of medical images using image registration: diagnostic and simulation applications.
Barber DC; Hose DR
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 15804853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2D/3D registration of endoscopic ultrasound to CT volume data.
Hummel J; Figl M; Bax M; Bergmann H; Birkfellner W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4303-16. PubMed ID: 18653922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm.
Ashburner J
Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):95-113. PubMed ID: 17761438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D/2D image registration: the impact of X-ray views and their number.
Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):450-7. PubMed ID: 18051090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
