These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23265916)

  • 1. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
    Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
    Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
    Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
    Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.
    Hoy SM; Scott LJ; Wagstaff AJ
    Drugs; 2009; 69(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19192941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
    Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.
    Perry E; Moore H; Reeve J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 30785667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
    Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial.
    Kim HG; Huh KC; Koo HS; Kim SE; Kim JO; Kim TI; Kim HS; Myung SJ; Park DI; Shin JE; Yang DH; Lee SH; Lee JS; Lee CK; Chang DK; Joo YE; Cha JM; Hong SP; Kim HJ
    Gut Liver; 2015 Jul; 9(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 25287163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-volume hybrid bowel preparation combining saline laxatives with oral contrast agents versus standard polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy.
    Lawrence EM; Pickhardt PJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20628282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating patients' preferences for type of bowel preparation prior to screening CT colonography: convenience and comfort versus sensitivity and specificity.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Boone D; Plumb A; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1140-5. PubMed ID: 23948662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-laxative CT colonography with barium-based faecal tagging: is additional phosphate enema beneficial and well tolerated?
    Davis W; Nisbet P; Hare C; Cooke P; Taylor SA
    Br J Radiol; 2011 Feb; 84(998):120-5. PubMed ID: 20959374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preparation regimen is more important than patient-related factors: a randomized trial comparing a standard bowel preparation before colonoscopy with an individualized approach.
    Voiosu T; Tanţău A; Voiosu A; Benguş A; Mocanu C; Smarandache B; Baicuş C; Vişovan I; Mateescu B
    Rom J Intern Med; 2017 Mar; 55(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 27736795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laxative-free CT colonography.
    Slater A; Betts M; D'Costa H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e410-5. PubMed ID: 22167512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomographic colonography with a reduced dose of laxative using a novel barium sulfate contrast agent in Japan.
    Mitsuzaki K; Iinuma G; Morimoto T; Miyake M; Tomimatsu H
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):245-254. PubMed ID: 30554302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
    Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1477-86. PubMed ID: 24817084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.
    Voiosu T; Ratiu I; Voiosu A; Iordache T; Schipor A; Baicus C; Sporea I; Voiosu R
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2013 Jun; 22(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 23799210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid with sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.
    Sahebally SM; Burke JP; Chu S; Mabadeje O; Geoghegan J
    Ir J Med Sci; 2015 Dec; 184(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 25156179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split-dose bowel cleansing with picosulphate is safe and better tolerated than 2-l polyethylene glycol solution.
    Mathus-Vliegen EMH; van der Vliet K; Wignand-van der Storm IJ; Stadwijk JS
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):709-717. PubMed ID: 29642094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.