These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23265964)
1. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Friston K; Moran R; Seth AK Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 23265964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of effective connectivity in the brain using a measure of directed information. Liu Y; Aviyente S Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():635103. PubMed ID: 22675401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random forest Granger causality for detection of effective brain connectivity using high-dimensional data. Furqan MS; Siyal MY J Integr Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 15(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26620192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The Granger causality models and their applications in brain effective connectivity networks]. Zhao T; Zheng G; Pan Z; Li Q; Wang L; Lu G Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 30(6):1343-9. PubMed ID: 24645623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis. Deshpande G; Hu X Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of neural activity based on fMRI data: a simulation study. Hemmelmann D; Leistritz L; Witte H; Galicki M J Physiol Paris; 2009 Nov; 103(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 19497366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The extended Granger causality analysis for Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal models. Cheng H; Cai D; Zhou D Chaos; 2020 Oct; 30(10):103102. PubMed ID: 33138445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bridging the Gap: Dynamic Causal Modeling and Granger Causality Analysis of Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bajaj S; Adhikari BM; Friston KJ; Dhamala M Brain Connect; 2016 Oct; 6(8):652-661. PubMed ID: 27506256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of latent confounders in directed network analysis in neuroscience. Ramb R; Eichler M; Ing A; Thiel M; Weiller C; Grebogi C; Schwarzbauer C; Timmer J; Schelter B Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2013 Aug; 371(1997):20110612. PubMed ID: 23858480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI. Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality. West TO; Halliday DM; Bressler SL; Farmer SF; Litvak V Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116796. PubMed ID: 32325209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest. Ashrafulla S; Haldar JP; Joshi AA; Leahy RM Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():189-99. PubMed ID: 23811410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of direct nonlinear effective connectivity using information theory and multilayer perceptron. Khadem A; Hossein-Zadeh GA J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():53-67. PubMed ID: 24751646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]