These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2326641)

  • 1. Bromley promises small science focus.
    Norman C
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impasse puts NIH grants on hold.
    Marshall E; Mervis J
    Science; 1996 Jan; 271(5245):22. PubMed ID: 8539589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bush's budget boost puts NIH on target for doubled figures.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6871):459. PubMed ID: 11823811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Healy attacks NASA's claims; bad news for research budgets.
    Mervis J
    Nature; 1992 Aug; 358(6386):441. PubMed ID: 1641030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic research in America (revisited).
    Sivak MV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Dec; 58(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 14652560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH budget increase largest in decade.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2016 May; 122(9):1309-11. PubMed ID: 27101201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public money, public values.
    Abrams SE
    Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 15566554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomedical boom, forget the rest?
    Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):965. PubMed ID: 11234028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Setting priorities for science funding.
    Hatfield MO
    Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5529):425. PubMed ID: 11464843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US health bodies reap funds for bioterrorism.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9308):771. PubMed ID: 11888599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biologists wary that cash up front could mean cuts later.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):677. PubMed ID: 12610581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The NIH stimulus--the recovery act and biomedical research.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1479-81. PubMed ID: 19357402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New "21st Century Cures" Legislation: Speed and Ease vs Science.
    Kesselheim AS; Avorn J
    JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(6):581-582. PubMed ID: 28056124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Priority initiatives in health care and research harmed by budget cuts.
    Kerschner JE
    WMJ; 2013 Jun; 112(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 23894813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When Federal science stopped.
    Mervis J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jan; 271(5246):136-7. PubMed ID: 8539608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
    Wells RD; Farnham P
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.