These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23266812)

  • 21. Improving containment strategies in biopharming.
    Murphy DJ
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 5(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 17645439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Food safety risks and consumer health.
    Chassy BM
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):534-44. PubMed ID: 20621653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a non-targeted "omic" approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants.
    Metzdorff SB; Kok EJ; Knuthsen P; Pedersen J
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2006 Sep; 8(5):662-72. PubMed ID: 16933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops.
    Parrott W; Chassy B; Ligon J; Meyer L; Petrick J; Zhou J; Herman R; Delaney B; Levine M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1773-90. PubMed ID: 20399824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: examples in potato and maize.
    Dijk JP; Leifert C; Barros E; Kok EJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 20600454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bringing a transgenic crop to market: where compositional analysis fits.
    Privalle LS; Gillikin N; Wandelt C
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8260-6. PubMed ID: 23534903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Strategies to evaluate the safety of bioengineered foods.
    Delaney B
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26(5):389-99. PubMed ID: 17963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safe and acceptable strategies for producing foreign molecules in plants.
    Mascia PN; Flavell RB
    Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2004 Apr; 7(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 15003220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms.
    Yu HL; Li YH; Wu KM
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2011 Jul; 53(7):520-38. PubMed ID: 21564541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian statistical approaches to compositional analyses of transgenic crops 2. Application and validation of informative prior distributions.
    Harrison JM; Breeze ML; Berman KH; Harrigan GG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23261475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Only half the transcriptomic differences between resistant genetically modified and conventional rice are associated with the transgene.
    Montero M; Coll A; Nadal A; Messeguer J; Pla M
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2011 Aug; 9(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 21040388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars.
    Cheng KC; Beaulieu J; Iquira E; Belzile FJ; Fortin MG; Strömvik MV
    J Agric Food Chem; 2008 May; 56(9):3057-67. PubMed ID: 18433101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advances in development of transgenic pulse crops.
    Eapen S
    Biotechnol Adv; 2008; 26(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 18055156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do whole-food animal feeding studies have any value in the safety assessment of GM crops?
    Herman RA; Ekmay R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 23851038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tracking genes from seed to supermarket: techniques and trends.
    Auer CA
    Trends Plant Sci; 2003 Dec; 8(12):591-7. PubMed ID: 14659708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety assessment of nonbrowning potatoes: opening the discussion about the relevance of substantial equivalence on next generation biotech crops.
    Llorente B; Alonso GD; Bravo-Almonacid F; Rodríguez V; López MG; Carrari F; Torres HN; Flawiá MM
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2011 Feb; 9(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 20497372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.