These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23267053)

  • 1. A simulation study of permutation, bootstrap, and gene dropping for assessing statistical significance in the case of unequal relatedness.
    Cheng R; Palmer AA
    Genetics; 2013 Mar; 193(3):1015-8. PubMed ID: 23267053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust rare variant association testing for quantitative traits in samples with related individuals.
    Jiang D; McPeek MS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24248908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical considerations regarding the use of genotype and pedigree data to model relatedness in the context of genome-wide association studies.
    Cheng R; Parker CC; Abney M; Palmer AA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Oct; 3(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 23979941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Permutation testing in the presence of polygenic variation.
    Abney M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 25758362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison Study of Fixed and Mixed Effect Models for Gene Level Association Studies of Complex Traits.
    Fan R; Chiu CY; Jung J; Weeks DE; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE; Amos CI; Chen Z; Mills JL; Xiong M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 40(8):702-721. PubMed ID: 27374056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on permutation tests for genetic association analysis of quantitative traits when variances are heterogeneous.
    Posthuma D; de Koning DJ; Dolan C; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(8):710-6. PubMed ID: 19365861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Locus-specific heritability estimation via the bootstrap in linkage scans for quantitative trait loci.
    Wu LY; Sun L; Bull SB
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(2):84-96. PubMed ID: 17047338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing genome-wide statistical significance for large p small n problems.
    Diao G; Vidyashankar AN
    Genetics; 2013 Jul; 194(3):781-3. PubMed ID: 23666935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Permutation and parametric bootstrap tests for gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.
    Bůžková P; Lumley T; Rice K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 Jan; 75(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20384625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating power and type 1 error in large pedigree analyses of binary traits.
    Cummings AC; Torstenson E; Davis MF; D'Aoust LN; Scott WK; Pericak-Vance MA; Bush WS; Haines JL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62615. PubMed ID: 23658753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simulation study concerning the effect of varying the residual phenotypic correlation on the power of bivariate quantitative trait loci linkage analysis.
    Evans DM; Duffy DL
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 14755178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associating Multivariate Quantitative Phenotypes with Genetic Variants in Family Samples with a Novel Kernel Machine Regression Method.
    Yan Q; Weeks DE; Celedón JC; Tiwari HK; Li B; Wang X; Lin WY; Lou XY; Gao G; Chen W; Liu N
    Genetics; 2015 Dec; 201(4):1329-39. PubMed ID: 26482791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CERAMIC: Case-Control Association Testing in Samples with Related Individuals, Based on Retrospective Mixed Model Analysis with Adjustment for Covariates.
    Zhong S; Jiang D; McPeek MS
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006329. PubMed ID: 27695091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Varying coefficient models for mapping quantitative trait loci using recombinant inbred intercrosses.
    Gong Y; Zou F
    Genetics; 2012 Feb; 190(2):475-86. PubMed ID: 22345613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical distributions of test statistics used for quantitative trait association mapping in structured populations.
    Teyssèdre S; Elsen JM; Ricard A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):32. PubMed ID: 23146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BRASS: Permutation methods for binary traits in genetic association studies with structured samples.
    Mbatchou J; Abney M; McPeek MS
    PLoS Genet; 2023 Nov; 19(11):e1011020. PubMed ID: 37934792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting for cryptic relatedness in population-based association studies of continuous traits.
    Zhang F; Deng HW
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19797906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
    Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.