These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23267463)

  • 21. Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide.
    Aldeghi M; Bluck JP; Biggin PC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():199-232. PubMed ID: 29594774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening.
    Cournia Z; Allen BK; Beuming T; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4153-4169. PubMed ID: 32539386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Baumann HM; Gapsys V; de Groot BL; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 May; 125(17):4241-4261. PubMed ID: 33905257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding the impact of binding free energy and kinetics calculations in modern drug discovery.
    Adediwura VA; Koirala K; Do HN; Wang J; Miao Y
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2024 Jun; 19(6):671-682. PubMed ID: 38722032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.
    Cappel D; Hall ML; Lenselink EB; Beuming T; Qi J; Bradner J; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2388-2400. PubMed ID: 28024402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
    Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Free energy calculations of protein-ligand interactions.
    de Ruiter A; Oostenbrink C
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 21684797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Addressing Suboptimal Poses in Nonequilibrium Alchemical Calculations.
    Karrenbrock M; Rizzi V; Procacci P; Gervasio FL
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1595-1605. PubMed ID: 38323915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodological uncertainties in drug-receptor binding free energy predictions based on classical molecular dynamics.
    Procacci P
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2021 Apr; 67():127-134. PubMed ID: 33220532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of the QUBE Force Field in SOMD for High-Throughput Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.
    Nelson L; Bariami S; Ringrose C; Horton JT; Kurdekar V; Mey ASJS; Michel J; Cole DJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2124-2130. PubMed ID: 33886305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
    Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fast free energy estimates from λ-dynamics with bias-updated Gibbs sampling.
    Robo MT; Hayes RL; Ding X; Pulawski B; Vilseck JZ
    Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8515. PubMed ID: 38129400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accelerating Alchemical Free Energy Prediction Using a Multistate Method: Application to Multiple Kinases.
    Champion C; Gall R; Ries B; Rieder SR; Barros EP; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Nov; 63(22):7133-7147. PubMed ID: 37948537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?
    Fu H; Chipot C; Shao X; Cai W
    J Phys Chem B; 2023 Dec; 127(49):10459-10468. PubMed ID: 37824848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Highly Flexible Protein MDM2 and Its Inhibitors.
    Singh N; Li W
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jul; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 32635537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Buried Water Molecules.
    Ge Y; Baumann HM; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6482-6499. PubMed ID: 36197451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving the Potential of Mean Force and Nonequilibrium Pulling Simulations by Simultaneous Alchemical Modifications.
    Reif MM; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3873-3893. PubMed ID: 35653503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate determination of protein:ligand standard binding free energies from molecular dynamics simulations.
    Fu H; Chen H; Blazhynska M; Goulard Coderc de Lacam E; Szczepaniak F; Pavlova A; Shao X; Gumbart JC; Dehez F; Roux B; Cai W; Chipot C
    Nat Protoc; 2022 Apr; 17(4):1114-1141. PubMed ID: 35277695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.