These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269299)

  • 1. Improving student selection using multiple mini-interviews with multifaceted Rasch modeling.
    Till H; Myford C; Dowell J
    Acad Med; 2013 Feb; 88(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 23269299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.
    Eva KW; Macala C
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 24807436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The multiple mini-interview in the U.K. context: 3 years of experience at Dundee.
    Dowell J; Lynch B; Till H; Kumwenda B; Husbands A
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 22455698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing Things Differently or Seeing Different Things? Exploring Raters' Associations of Noncognitive Attributes.
    Sebok SS; Syer MD
    Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S50-5. PubMed ID: 26505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.
    Yamada T; Sato J; Yoshimura H; Okubo T; Hiraoka E; Shiga T; Kubota T; Fujitani S; Machi J; Ban N
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 28302124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the sequence of rotations in Multiple Mini Interview stations influence the candidates' performance?
    Kim KJ; Kwon BS
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1485433. PubMed ID: 29912677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.
    Yoshimura H; Kitazono H; Fujitani S; Machi J; Saiki T; Suzuki Y; Ponnamperuma G
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():75. PubMed ID: 25890189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Candidate Evaluation Using Targeted Construct Assessment in the Multiple Mini-Interview: A Multifaceted Rasch Model Analysis.
    McLaughlin JE; Singer D; Cox WC
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27466859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.
    Kim KJ; Nam KS; Kwon BS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28264549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough?
    Dodson M; Crotty B; Prideaux D; Carne R; Ward A; de Leeuw E
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19161488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview?
    Roberts C; Rothnie I; Zoanetti N; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2010 Jul; 44(7):690-8. PubMed ID: 20636588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School.
    Harris S; Owen C
    Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 17316207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generalizability study of the medical judgment vignettes interview to assess students' noncognitive attributes for medical school.
    Donnon T; Paolucci EO
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 8():58. PubMed ID: 19077202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance in attributes assessed by the multiple mini-interview.
    Zaidi NB; Swoboda C; Wang LL; Manuel RS
    Med Teach; 2014 Sep; 36(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 24820377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Trinh K; Wood TJ; Norman GR
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23212501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
    Pau A; Chen YS; Lee VK; Sow CF; De Alwis R
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29874. PubMed ID: 26873337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses.
    Sebok SS; Luu K; Klinger DA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 23709188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.