These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269531)
1. Recognizing errors in medical literature. Conte D Intern Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 8(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 23269531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of statistics in the British Journal of Psychiatry. McGuigan SM Br J Psychiatry; 1995 Nov; 167(5):683-8. PubMed ID: 8564329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the quality of statistics in psychiatric research. Hand D; Sham P Br J Psychiatry; 1995 Nov; 167(5):689-91. PubMed ID: 8564330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact factor--a useful tool, but not for all purposes. Baethge C Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Apr; 109(15):267-9. PubMed ID: 22567061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journal Impact Factor: does it have an impact? Pierot L; Krainik A J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 42(5):253-4. PubMed ID: 26278030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Of impact, metrics and ethics. Carrió I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Jun; 35(6):1049-50. PubMed ID: 18414852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Case for the Case Report. Malatack JJ Pediatrics; 2018 Apr; 141(Suppl 5):S379-S384. PubMed ID: 29610155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus? Evans RG; Su DF Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Errors in medical literature: not a question of impact. Costantino G; Casazza G; Cernuschi G; Solbiati M; Birocchi S; Ceriani E; Duca P; Montano N Intern Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 8(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 23179330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bibliometric data result in wrong interpretation of the scientific creativeness]. Zetterström R Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(21):2376-9. PubMed ID: 12090162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quantity versus quality: a review on current methodological dispute in health services research]. Sikorski C; Glaesmer H; Bramesfeld A Psychiatr Prax; 2010 Oct; 37(7):322-8. PubMed ID: 20886397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: the obstacles facing scientific and medical publishing in Saudi Arabia. Cathey JT Ann Saudi Med; 2014; 34(4):362-3. PubMed ID: 25811216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The status of open access publishing by academic societies. Byrd GD; Bader SA; Mazzaschi AJ J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Oct; 93(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16239934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of student contribution to the Medical Journal of Australia between 2001 and 2014. Alamri Y; Osman M Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):189-190. PubMed ID: 29490226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of references in the orthopaedic literature. Sutherland AG; Craig N; Maffulli N; Brooksbank A; Moir JS J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Jan; 82(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 10697307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Publishing surgery. Smith R Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9206):849. PubMed ID: 10711959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In Reply to McKendree. Azer SA Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):451. PubMed ID: 27023192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [We Are All 3868]. Marinho RT Acta Med Port; 2019 Mar; 32(3):173-174. PubMed ID: 30946785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor Relations: Social Scientists and Medical Education. McKendree J Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):451. PubMed ID: 27023191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]