BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269714)

  • 1. Breast mass characterization using 3-dimensional automated ultrasound as an adjunct to digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot study.
    Padilla F; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Sinha SP; Goodsitt MM; Le Carpentier GL; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Fowlkes JB; Joe AD; Klein KA; Nees AV; Noroozian M; Patterson SK; Pinsky RW; Hooi FM; Carson PL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 23269714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
    Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.
    Noroozian M; Hadjiiski L; Rahnama-Moghadam S; Klein KA; Jeffries DO; Pinsky RW; Chan HP; Carson PL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21998048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Bailey JE; Nees AV; Blane CE; Adler DD; Patterson SK; Klein KA; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):810-8. PubMed ID: 19375953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
    Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Alakhras MM; Brennan PC; Rickard M; Bourne R; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 25192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.
    Gur D; Zuley ML; Anello MI; Rathfon GY; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Wallace L; Lu A; Bandos AI
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 22098941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.
    Thibault F; Dromain C; Breucq C; Balleyguier CS; Malhaire C; Steyaert L; Tardivon A; Baldan E; Drevon H
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2441-9. PubMed ID: 23673573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Ruppel P; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Bezzon E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Mar; 23(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 22976919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.