89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269714)
21. Use of 3D ultrasound to characterise temporal changes in thyroid nodules: an in vitro study.
Cheng A; Lee JWK; Ngiam KY
J Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 26(3):643-651. PubMed ID: 36053484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the FUSION-X-US-II prototype to combine automated breast ultrasound and tomosynthesis.
Schäfgen B; Juskic M; Radicke M; Hertel M; Barr R; Pfob A; Togawa R; Nees J; von Au A; Fastner S; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Riedel F; Hennigs A; Sohn C; Heil J; Golatta M
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3712-3720. PubMed ID: 33313983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preliminary Clinical Experience with a Combined Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
Larson ED; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Goodsitt MM; Lashbrook C; Davis CE; Kripfgans OD; Carson PL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 44(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 29311005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Schaefgen B; Heil J; Barr RG; Radicke M; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Hennigs A; von Au A; Spratte J; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 29302784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automated Breast Ultrasound: Dual-Sided Compared with Single-Sided Imaging.
Larson ED; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Goodsitt MM; Lashbrook C; Zafar F; Kripfgans OD; Thomenius K; Carson PL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2072-82. PubMed ID: 27264914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound.
Vaughan CL; Douglas TS; Said-Hartley Q; Baasch RV; Boonzaier JA; Goemans BC; Harverson J; Mingay MW; Omar S; Smith RV; Venter NC; Wilson HS
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 27133694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.
Dendumrongsup T; Plumb AA; Halligan S; Fanshawe TR; Altman DG; Mallett S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116018. PubMed ID: 25541977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Advances in managing breast cancer: a clinical update.
Gucalp A; Gupta GP; Pilewskie ML; Sutton EJ; Norton L
F1000Prime Rep; 2014; 6():66. PubMed ID: 25165565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined photoacoustic and acoustic imaging of human breast specimens in the mammographic geometry.
Xie Z; Hooi FM; Fowlkes JB; Pinsky RW; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):2176-84. PubMed ID: 23972486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.
Noroozian M; Hadjiiski L; Rahnama-Moghadam S; Klein KA; Jeffries DO; Pinsky RW; Chan HP; Carson PL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21998048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast mass characterization using 3-dimensional automated ultrasound as an adjunct to digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot study.
Padilla F; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Sinha SP; Goodsitt MM; Le Carpentier GL; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Fowlkes JB; Joe AD; Klein KA; Nees AV; Noroozian M; Patterson SK; Pinsky RW; Hooi FM; Carson PL
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 23269714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
