BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269714)

  • 41. Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings.
    Bansal GJ; Young P
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20140855. PubMed ID: 26133221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Pilot Study to Assess the Performance of Phase-Sensitive Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Fajardo LL; Hillis SL; Zheng B; Wong MD; Ghani MU; Omoumi FH; Li Y; Jenkins P; Peterson ME; Wu X; Liu H
    Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e213198. PubMed ID: 36165790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 23169790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
    Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection.
    Trieu PDY; Noakes J; Li T; Borecky N; Brennan PC; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220704. PubMed ID: 36802348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
    Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
    Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Deformable Mapping Method to Relate Lesions in Dedicated Breast CT Images to Those in Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Lau JH; Brock KK; Davis CL; Carson PL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 46(3):750-765. PubMed ID: 31806500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multiplanar Reconstructions of 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound Improve Lesion Differentiation by Radiologists.
    Van Zelst JC; Platel B; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26345538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Carbonaro LA; Pancot M; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2830-9. PubMed ID: 25903704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Slab Thickness: Impact on Reader Performance and Interpretation Time.
    Pujara AC; Joe AI; Patterson SK; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Ma T; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Maturen KE
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):534-542. PubMed ID: 33021891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.