These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23269928)

  • 1. Double genomic control is not effective to correct for population stratification in meta-analysis for genome-wide association studies.
    Wang S; Chen W; Chen X; Hu F; Archer KJ; Liu HN; Sun S; Gao G
    Front Genet; 2012; 3():300. PubMed ID: 23269928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast and efficient correction for population stratification in multi-locus genome-wide association studies.
    Liu R; Yuan M; Xu XS; Yang Y
    Genetica; 2021 Dec; 149(5-6):313-325. PubMed ID: 34480683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal selection of genetic variants for adjustment of population stratification in European association studies.
    Brinster R; Scherer D; Lorenzo Bermejo J
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):753-761. PubMed ID: 30863848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control for population stratification in genetic association studies based on GWAS summary statistics.
    Yan S; Sha Q; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 46(8):604-614. PubMed ID: 35766057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power considerations for λ inflation factor in meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies.
    Georgiopoulos G; Evangelou E
    Genet Res (Camb); 2016 May; 98():e9. PubMed ID: 27193946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and application of genomic control methods for genome-wide association studies using non-additive models.
    Tsepilov YA; Ried JS; Strauch K; Grallert H; van Duijn CM; Axenovich TI; Aulchenko YS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81431. PubMed ID: 24358113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of association methods correcting for population stratification in case-control studies.
    Wu C; DeWan A; Hoh J; Wang Z
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 May; 75(3):418-27. PubMed ID: 21281271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sample stratification on dairy GWAS results.
    Ma L; Wiggans GR; Wang S; Sonstegard TS; Yang J; Crooker BA; Cole JB; Van Tassell CP; Lawlor TJ; Da Y
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():536. PubMed ID: 23039970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining multi-population datasets for joint genome-wide association and meta-analyses: The case of bovine milk fat composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Buitenhuis AJ; Poulsen NA; Visker MHPW; Zhang Q; van Valenberg HJF; Sun D; Bovenhuis H
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Dec; 102(12):11124-11141. PubMed ID: 31563305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.
    Dadd T; Weale ME; Lewis CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19051284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of population-based association study methods correcting for population stratification.
    Zhang F; Wang Y; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3392. PubMed ID: 18852890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies.
    Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of methods for adjusting population stratification in genome-wide association studies: Standard versus categorical principal component analysis.
    Turkmen AS; Yuan Y; Billor N
    Ann Hum Genet; 2019 Nov; 83(6):454-464. PubMed ID: 31322288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A propensity score approach to correction for bias due to population stratification using genetic and non-genetic factors.
    Zhao H; Rebbeck TR; Mitra N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(8):679-90. PubMed ID: 19353632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allowing for population stratification in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction, using genomic control.
    Yadav P; Freitag-Wolf S; Lieb W; Dempfle A; Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 134(10):1117-25. PubMed ID: 26297539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for population stratification in a fine scale with principal components and sequencing data.
    Zhang Y; Shen X; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 37(8):787-801. PubMed ID: 24123217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of population stratification analysis on false-positive rates for common and rare variants.
    He H; Zhang X; Ding L; Baye TM; Kurowski BG; Martin LJ
    BMC Proc; 2011 Nov; 5 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S116. PubMed ID: 22373282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clustering by genetic ancestry using genome-wide SNP data.
    Solovieff N; Hartley SW; Baldwin CT; Perls TT; Steinberg MH; Sebastiani P
    BMC Genet; 2010 Dec; 11():108. PubMed ID: 21143920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction for population stratification in random forest analysis.
    Zhao Y; Chen F; Zhai R; Lin X; Wang Z; Su L; Christiani DC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1798-806. PubMed ID: 23148107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.