These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270288)

  • 1. Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Fränkel II appliance. A prospective controlled study.
    Silvestrini-Biavati A; Alberti G; Silvestrini Biavati F; Signori A; Castaldo A; Migliorati M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 23270288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
    Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Castaldo MI; Jamilian A; Padricelli G; Fahimi Hanzayi M; Cappabianca S; Perillo L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23597214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
    Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
    Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible.
    Jena AK; Singh SP; Utreja AK
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):728-34. PubMed ID: 23241007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator.
    Alali OH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 23987240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects.
    Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):718-27. PubMed ID: 23194014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and dental effects produced by functional regulator-2 in pre-pubertal class II patients: a controlled study.
    Perillo L; Femiano A; Palumbo S; Contardo L; Perinetti G
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():18. PubMed ID: 24325832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yildirim E; Karacay S; Erkan M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 24713070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.