These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270400)

  • 1. Professionals' views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis.
    Smith V; Begley CM; Clarke M; Devane D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():166. PubMed ID: 23270400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obesity and normal birth: A qualitative study of clinician's management of obese pregnant women during labour.
    Kerrigan A; Kingdon C; Cheyne H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():256. PubMed ID: 26459259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
    Davies B; Hodnett E; Hannah M; O'Brien-Pallas L; Pringle D; Wells G;
    CMAJ; 2002 Sep; 167(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 12240812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a physiological approach during labour and birth: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.
    Darling F; McCourt PC; Cartwright DM
    Midwifery; 2021 Jan; 92():102861. PubMed ID: 33137546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour.
    Cheyne H; Dunlop A; Shields N; Mathers AM
    Midwifery; 2003 Sep; 19(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 12946338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consent on the labour ward: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of healthcare professionals.
    Kennedy S; Lanceley A; Whitten M; Kelly C; Nicholls J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():150-154. PubMed ID: 34303075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic meta-thematic synthesis to examine the views and experiences of women following water immersion during labour and waterbirth.
    Feeley C; Cooper M; Burns E
    J Adv Nurs; 2021 Jul; 77(7):2942-2956. PubMed ID: 33464640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review.
    Healy S; Humphreys E; Kennedy C
    Women Birth; 2016 Apr; 29(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 26363668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early warning systems in maternity care: A qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care providers' views and experiences.
    Smith V; O'Malley D; Cithambaram K
    Midwifery; 2022 Sep; 112():103402. PubMed ID: 35724435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.
    Macdonald D; Snelgrove-Clarke E; Campbell-Yeo M; Aston M; Helwig M; Baker KA
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):74-127. PubMed ID: 26657466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insights of healthcare professionals regarding waterbirths and water immersion during labour: A mixed studies review.
    Chua JYX; Choolani M; Lalor JG; Chong YS; Shorey S
    J Adv Nurs; 2024 Jun; 80(6):2156-2166. PubMed ID: 37994222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midwife-led maternity care in Ireland - a retrospective cohort study.
    Dencker A; Smith V; McCann C; Begley C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28351386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should women be given a choice about fetal assessment in labor?
    Wood SH
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2003; 28(5):292-8; quiz 299-300. PubMed ID: 14501630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed-methods systematic review: Childbearing women's views, experiences, and decision-making related to epidural analgesia in labour.
    Borrelli S; Evans K; Pallotti P; Evans C; Eldridge J; Spiby H
    J Adv Nurs; 2020 Dec; 76(12):3273-3292. PubMed ID: 32989801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health professionals' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to providing smoking cessation advice to women in pregnancy and during the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research.
    Flemming K; Graham H; McCaughan D; Angus K; Sinclair L; Bauld L
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Mar; 16():290. PubMed ID: 27030251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwife-led care for childbearing women in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review.
    Sangy MT; Duaso M; Feeley C; Walker S
    Midwifery; 2023 Jul; 122():103696. PubMed ID: 37099826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of regional guidelines for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in women at low obstetric risk.
    Hinsliff SW; Hindley C; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 15571883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.