147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270502)
1. Inclusion of cow records in genomic evaluations and impact on bias due to preferential treatment.
Dassonneville R; Baur A; Fritz S; Boichard D; Ducrocq V
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):40. PubMed ID: 23270502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.
Karoui S; Carabaño MJ; Díaz C; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):39. PubMed ID: 23216664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of genomic prediction on milk flow traits in dairy cattle.
Gray KA; Cassady JP; Huang Y; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):24. PubMed ID: 22846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3332-5. PubMed ID: 23477821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short communication: Reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis.
Bauer J; Přibyl J; Vostrý L
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4999-5003. PubMed ID: 25935244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Milk production of Holstein-Friesian cows of divergent Economic Breeding Index evaluated under seasonal pasture-based management.
O'Sullivan M; Horan B; Pierce KM; McParland S; O'Sullivan K; Buckley F
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2560-2577. PubMed ID: 30612799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for feed intake and energy balance using pedigree relationships or single-step genomic evaluation in Holstein Friesian cows.
Harder I; Stamer E; Junge W; Thaller G
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2498-2513. PubMed ID: 31864743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
