159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270721)
1. CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases.
Cavaignac E; Lecoq M; Ponsot A; Moine A; Bonnevialle N; Mansat P; Sans N; Bonnevialle P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Feb; 99(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 23270721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of the reproducibility of X-rays and CT scans for assessing trochanteric fracture comminution in the elderly: a series of 110 cases.
Isida R; Bariatinsky V; Kern G; Dereudre G; Demondion X; Chantelot C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1165-70. PubMed ID: 26141046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Cho YC; Lee PY; Lee CH; Chen CH; Lin YM
Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 30152606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification.
Gicquel T; Najihi N; Vendeuvre T; Teyssedou S; Gayet LE; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 99(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 24120208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of CT compared to radiographs in the classification and treatment plan of trochanteric fractures.
van Embden D; Scheurkogel MM; Schipper IB; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1091-7. PubMed ID: 27365082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification.
Shoda E; Kitada S; Sasaki Y; Hirase H; Niikura T; Lee SY; Sakurai A; Oe K; Sasaki T
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017 Jan; 25(1):2309499017692700. PubMed ID: 28211303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.
Chapman CB; Herrera MF; Binenbaum G; Schweppe M; Staron RB; Feldman F; Rosenwasser MP
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Sep; 32(9):443-9. PubMed ID: 14560826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Besa P; Zamora M; Schweitzer D; Klaber I
Injury; 2015; 46(6):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25818057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures.
Iguchi M; Takahashi T; Matsumura T; Ae R; Hiyama S; Nakashima M; Takeshita K
Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3363-3368. PubMed ID: 34598792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
Martin JS; Marsh JL; Bonar SK; DeCoster TA; Found EM; Brandser EA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 9334948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total talar fracture - inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of two classification systems (Hawkins and AO) for central talar fractures.
Williams T; Barba N; Noailles T; Steiger V; Pineau V; Carvalhana G; Le Jacques B; Clave A; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 98(4 Suppl):S56-65. PubMed ID: 22613935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures: an assessment of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Andersen E; Jørgensen LG; Hededam LT
Injury; 1990 Nov; 21(6):377-8. PubMed ID: 2276801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Traction images heavily influence lateral wall measurement in trochanteric hip fractures. A prospective study.
Carmona M; Gonzalez N; Segovia J; de Amesti M; Zamora T; Schweitzer D
Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110724. PubMed ID: 38143142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
