BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270876)

  • 1. Neural correlates of attentional deployment within unpleasant pictures.
    Ferri J; Schmidt J; Hajcak G; Canli T
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():268-77. PubMed ID: 23270876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotion regulation and amygdala-precuneus connectivity: Focusing on attentional deployment.
    Ferri J; Schmidt J; Hajcak G; Canli T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):991-1002. PubMed ID: 27444935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. See no evil: directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response.
    Dunning JP; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jan; 46(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18992071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotion regulation abnormalities in schizophrenia: Directed attention strategies fail to decrease the neurophysiological response to unpleasant stimuli.
    Strauss GP; Kappenman ES; Culbreth AJ; Catalano LT; Ossenfort KL; Lee BG; Gold JM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2015 May; 124(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 25486078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: time-course of the late positive potential.
    Hajcak G; Dunning JP; Foti D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 19157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Hajcak G; MacNamara A; Foti D; Ferri J; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional disengagement is modulated by the offset of unpleasant pictures: a saccadic reaction time study.
    Machado-Pinheiro W; Faria A; Braga F; Guerra P; Perakakis P; Caldas AL; Mocaiber I; Oliveira L; Pereira MG; Volchan E; Vila J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Dec; 90(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 24177247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivated attention in emotional picture processing is reflected by activity modulation in cortical attention networks.
    Moratti S; Keil A; Stolarova M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Mar; 21(3):954-64. PubMed ID: 15006662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Awareness modulates responses of the amygdala and the visual cortex to highly arousing visual threat.
    Hoffmann M; Lipka J; Mothes-Lasch M; Miltner WH; Straube T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1439-44. PubMed ID: 22659485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconstructing reappraisal: descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response.
    Foti D; Hajcak G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):977-88. PubMed ID: 18211235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural response to emotional pictures is unaffected by concurrent task difficulty: an event-related potential study.
    Hajcak G; Dunning JP; Foti D
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 121(6):1156-62. PubMed ID: 18085868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotion-attention network interactions during a visual oddball task.
    Fichtenholtz HM; Dean HL; Dillon DG; Yamasaki H; McCarthy G; LaBar KS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 15130591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affective processing in natural scene viewing: valence and arousal interactions in eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Le Fevre K; Torniainen J; Baccino T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():21-33. PubMed ID: 25463473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotional state affects the initiation of forward gait.
    Naugle KM; Hass CJ; Joyner J; Coombes SA; Janelle CM
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 21500896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Focused Attention on Emotional Experience: A Functional MRI Investigation.
    Dolcos F; Katsumi Y; Shen C; Bogdan PC; Jun S; Larsen R; Heller W; Bost KF; Dolcos S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 20(5):1011-1026. PubMed ID: 32770316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction.
    Kanske P; Heissler J; Schönfelder S; Bongers A; Wessa M
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21041200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional bias to emotional stimuli is altered during moderate- but not high-intensity exercise.
    Tian Q; Smith JC
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1415-24. PubMed ID: 21707164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The valence strength of unpleasant emotion modulates brain processing of behavioral inhibitory control: neural correlates.
    Yuan J; Meng X; Yang J; Yao G; Hu L; Yuan H
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 22056697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.