BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270935)

  • 1. Balancing continuous covariates based on Kernel densities.
    Ma Z; Hu F
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Mar; 34(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 23270935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.
    Zhao W; Hill MD; Palesch Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):989-1002. PubMed ID: 22287602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Balancing continuous and categorical baseline covariates in sequential clinical trials using the area between empirical cumulative distribution functions.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(18):1961-71. PubMed ID: 22532082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials.
    Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):547-50. PubMed ID: 21382510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple, flexible, and effective covariate-adaptive treatment allocation procedure.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3775-87. PubMed ID: 23637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study.
    Xiao L; Lavori PW; Wilson SR; Ma J
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21335590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation.
    Han B; Yu M; McEntegart D
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 23760923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.
    Zhao W
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5239-48. PubMed ID: 25043719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation and minimization: technical advances for factorial experiments designed to optimize clinical interventions.
    Kuhn J; Sheldrick RC; Broder-Fingert S; Chu A; Fortuna L; Jordan M; Rubin D; Feinberg E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):239. PubMed ID: 31842765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures.
    Kundt G
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19283309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-Minimization for balanced assignment of subjects in clinical trials.
    Stigsby B; Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 20004741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hybrid approach to achieving both marginal and conditional balances for stratification variables in sequential clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 23897862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.