BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23270978)

  • 1. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. With hiccups and bumps: the development of a Rasch-based instrument to measure elementary students' understanding of the nature of science.
    Peoples SM; O'Dwyer LM; Shields KA; Wang Y
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):57-78. PubMed ID: 23442328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the Rasch measurement model to design a report writing assessment instrument.
    Carlson WR
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 23442325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using multidimensional Rasch to enhance measurement precision: initial results from simulation and empirical studies.
    Mok MM; Xu K
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23442326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the alignment of writing self-efficacy with writing achievement using rasch measurement theory and qualitative methods.
    Engelhard G; Behizadeh N
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):132-45. PubMed ID: 22805358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining Rater Judgements in Music Performance Assessment using Many-Facets Rasch Rating Scale Measurement Model.
    Ooi PS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 30789834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch modeling to assess Albanian and South African learners' preferences for real-life situations to be used in mathematics: a pilot study.
    Kacerja S; Julie C; Hadjerrouit S
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 23442330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rater effect comparability in local independence and rater bundle models.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24950533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for assessing reflective journal writing.
    Plack MM; Driscoll M; Blissett S; McKenna R; Plack TP
    J Allied Health; 2005; 34(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 16529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental study using Rasch analysis to compare absolute magnitude estimation and categorical rating scaling as applied in survey research.
    Koskey KL; Sondergeld TA; Beltyukova SA; Fox CM
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):262-81. PubMed ID: 23816614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.
    Paek I; Lee J; Stankov L; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 23816612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditional pairwise person parameter estimates in Rasch models.
    Kreiner S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 23270977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement.
    Uebersax JS; Grove WM
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):823-35. PubMed ID: 10798855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.