131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23271447)
1. Simulation system for understanding the lag effect in fluoroscopic images.
Tanaka R; Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 23271447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy.
Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Mori S; Dobashi S; Kumagai M; Kawashima H; Minohara S; Sanada S
J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 21030796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation approach for the evaluation of tracking accuracy in radiotherapy: a preliminary study.
Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Mori S; Sanada S
J Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 54(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 22843379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of image lag in a flat-panel, detector-equipped cardiovascular X-ray machine using a newly developed dynamic phantom.
Sato H; Kondo K; Kato K; Nakazawa Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5213. PubMed ID: 26103192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.
Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1624-41. PubMed ID: 10501063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lag correction model and ghosting analysis for an indirect-conversion flat-panel imager.
Mail N; O'Brien P; Pang G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 8(3):137-146. PubMed ID: 17712306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the Lag Correction Factor in Low-Dose Fluoroscopic Imaging.
Kim DS; Lee E
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Jun; 40(6):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 33651686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.
Hatakeyama Y; Kakeda S; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W; Korogi Y
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 17416814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of an image planning system for kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy.
Thapa BB; Molloy JA
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061703. PubMed ID: 23718582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method.
Maruyama S
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1461-1468. PubMed ID: 33151466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequential dual-energy subtraction technique with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD): primary study for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT).
Tanaka R; Sanada S; Matsui T; Hayashi N; Matsui O
Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 20821140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
