234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23271725)
1. Chromothripsis and focal copy number alterations determine poor outcome in malignant melanoma.
Hirsch D; Kemmerling R; Davis S; Camps J; Meltzer PS; Ried T; Gaiser T
Cancer Res; 2013 Mar; 73(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 23271725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marked genetic differences between BRAF and NRAS mutated primary melanomas as revealed by array comparative genomic hybridization.
Lázár V; Ecsedi S; Vízkeleti L; Rákosy Z; Boross G; Szappanos B; Bégány A; Emri G; Adány R; Balázs M
Melanoma Res; 2012 Jun; 22(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 22456166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-genome copy-number analysis identifies new leads for chromosomal aberrations involved in the oncogenesis and metastastic behavior of uveal melanomas.
van Engen-van Grunsven AC; Baar MP; Pfundt R; Rijntjes J; Küsters-Vandevelde HV; Delbecq AL; Keunen JE; Klevering JB; Wesseling P; Blokx WA; Groenen PJ
Melanoma Res; 2015 Jun; 25(3):200-9. PubMed ID: 25756553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Characterization of genetic alterations in primary human melanomas carrying BRAF or NRAS mutation].
Lázár V
Magy Onkol; 2013 Jun; 57(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 23795354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of copy number variations in melanocytic lesions utilising array based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Mesbah Ardakani N; Thomas C; Robinson C; Mina K; Harvey NT; Amanuel B; Wood BA
Pathology; 2017 Apr; 49(3):285-291. PubMed ID: 28274670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Bastian BC; LeBoit PE; Hamm H; Bröcker EB; Pinkel D
Cancer Res; 1998 May; 58(10):2170-5. PubMed ID: 9605762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomewide copy number analysis of Müllerian adenosarcoma identified chromosomal instability in the aggressive subgroup.
Lee JC; Lu TP; Changou CA; Liang CW; Huang HN; Lauria A; Huang HY; Lin CY; Chiang YC; Davidson B; Lin MC; Kuo KT
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1070-82. PubMed ID: 27255164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Copy number variations and clinical outcome in atypical spitz tumors.
Raskin L; Ludgate M; Iyer RK; Ackley TE; Bradford CR; Johnson TM; Fullen DR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 21263245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [DNA copy number changes in the diagnosis of melanocytic tumors].
Bauer J; Bastian BC
Pathologe; 2007 Nov; 28(6):464-73. PubMed ID: 17882420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlating array comparative genomic hybridization findings with histology and outcome in spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms.
Ali L; Helm T; Cheney R; Conroy J; Sait S; Guitart J; Gerami P
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2010 Jun; 3(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 20661407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chromosomal imbalances in primary and metastatic melanomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization.
Balázs M; Adám Z; Treszl A; Bégány A ; Hunyadi J; Adány R
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 46(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 11514955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinct chromosomal aberrations in sinonasal mucosal melanoma as detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
van Dijk M; Sprenger S; Rombout P; Marres H; Kaanders J; Jeuken J; Ruiter D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Feb; 36(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 12508243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosomal rearrangements in uveal melanoma: Chromothripsis.
van Poppelen NM; Yavuzyigitoglu S; Smit KN; Vaarwater J; Eussen B; Brands T; Paridaens D; Kiliç E; de Klein A
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2018 Sep; 57(9):452-458. PubMed ID: 29726589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome.
Namiki T; Yanagawa S; Izumo T; Ishikawa M; Tachibana M; Kawakami Y; Yokozeki H; Nishioka K; Kaneko Y
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Feb; 157(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15676140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional genomic analysis of chromosomal aberrations in a compendium of 8000 cancer genomes.
Kim TM; Xi R; Luquette LJ; Park RW; Johnson MD; Park PJ
Genome Res; 2013 Feb; 23(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 23132910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chromosomal gains and losses in uveal melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Speicher MR; Prescher G; du Manoir S; Jauch A; Horsthemke B; Bornfeld N; Becher R; Cremer T
Cancer Res; 1994 Jul; 54(14):3817-23. PubMed ID: 8033101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative cytogenetic characterization of primary canine melanocytic lesions using array CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Poorman K; Borst L; Moroff S; Roy S; Labelle P; Motsinger-Reif A; Breen M
Chromosome Res; 2015 Jun; 23(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 25511566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of numerical chromosomal aberrations in malignant melanomas using fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Matsuta M; Imamura Y; Matsuta M; Sasaki K; Kon S
J Cutan Pathol; 1997 Apr; 24(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9138109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Distinct Class of Chromoanagenesis Events Characterized by Focal Copy Number Gains.
Masset H; Hestand MS; Van Esch H; Kleinfinger P; Plaisancié J; Afenjar A; Molignier R; Schluth-Bolard C; Sanlaville D; Vermeesch JR
Hum Mutat; 2016 Jul; 37(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 26936114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Copy number gains in 11q13 and 8q24 [corrected] are highly linked to prognosis in cutaneous malignant melanoma.
Gerami P; Jewell SS; Pouryazdanparast P; Wayne JD; Haghighat Z; Busam KJ; Rademaker A; Morrison L
J Mol Diagn; 2011 May; 13(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 21497295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
