These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23271990)

  • 1. Non-parametric statistical thresholding for sparse magnetoencephalography source reconstructions.
    Owen JP; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():186. PubMed ID: 23271990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of the Champagne source reconstruction algorithm on simulated and real M/EEG data.
    Owen JP; Wipf DP; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):305-23. PubMed ID: 22209808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.
    Chang WT; Nummenmaa A; Hsieh JC; Lin FH
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 20488248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust Empirical Bayesian Reconstruction of Distributed Sources for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging.
    Cai C; Diwakar M; Chen D; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 39(3):567-577. PubMed ID: 31380750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust estimation of noise for electromagnetic brain imaging with the champagne algorithm.
    Cai C; Hashemi A; Diwakar M; Haufe S; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117411. PubMed ID: 33039615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.
    Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():427-43. PubMed ID: 24055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations.
    Gramfort A; Strohmeier D; Haueisen J; Hämäläinen MS; Kowalski M
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():410-22. PubMed ID: 23291276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of weighted minimum-norm estimation with Tikhonov regularization for neuromagnetic source imaging].
    Hu J; Hu J; Wang Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 12744189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Validation of the Champagne Algorithm for Evoked Response Source Localization in Magnetoencephalography.
    Bhutada AS; Cai C; Mizuiri D; Findlay A; Chen J; Tay A; Kirsch HE; Nagarajan SS
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jan; 35(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 34114168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
    Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing the regularization for image reconstruction of cerebral diffuse optical tomography.
    Habermehl C; Steinbrink J; Müller KR; Haufe S
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Sep; 19(9):96006. PubMed ID: 25208243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.
    Huang MX; Huang CW; Robb A; Angeles A; Nichols SL; Baker DG; Song T; Harrington DL; Theilmann RJ; Srinivasan R; Heister D; Diwakar M; Canive JM; Edgar JC; Chen YH; Ji Z; Shen M; El-Gabalawy F; Levy M; McLay R; Webb-Murphy J; Liu TT; Drake A; Lee RR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():585-604. PubMed ID: 24055704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unification of sparse Bayesian learning algorithms for electromagnetic brain imaging with the majorization minimization framework.
    Hashemi A; Cai C; Kutyniok G; Müller KR; Nagarajan SS; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 239():118309. PubMed ID: 34182100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-Gaussian probabilistic MEG source localisation based on kernel density estimation.
    Mohseni HR; Kringelbach ML; Woolrich MW; Baker A; Aziz TZ; Probert-Smith P
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():444-64. PubMed ID: 24055702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for statistical thresholding of source localization maps in magnetoencephalography and estimating source extent.
    Maksymenko K; Giusiano B; Roehri N; Bénar CG; Badier JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Oct; 290():95-104. PubMed ID: 28739163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-parametric statistical thresholding of baseline free MEG beamformer images.
    Prendergast G; Johnson SR; Hymers M; Woods W; Green GG
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):906-18. PubMed ID: 20696257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.