These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23273449)

  • 41. Eating green. Consumers' willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors.
    Tobler C; Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2011 Dec; 57(3):674-82. PubMed ID: 21896294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Heterogeneous risk perceptions: the case of poultry meat purchase intentions in Finland.
    Heikkilä J; Pouta E; Forsman-Hugg S; Mäkelä J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2013 Oct; 10(10):4925-43. PubMed ID: 24157513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Service quality and corporate social responsibility, influence on post-purchase intentions of sheltered employment institutions.
    Chen CC; Lin SY; Cheng CH; Tsai CC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012; 33(6):1832-40. PubMed ID: 22699256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.
    Katiyo W; Coorey R; Buys EM; de Kock HL
    J Food Sci; 2020 Jun; 85(6):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 32469089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of consumers' preferences and behavior with regard to horse meat using a structured survey questionnaire.
    Oh WY; Lee JW; Lee CE; Ko MS; Jeong JH
    Anim Sci J; 2009 Dec; 80(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 20163664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite.
    Hung Y; de Kok TM; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():119-126. PubMed ID: 27310600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature.
    Moeller SJ; Miller RK; Edwards KK; Zerby HN; Logan KE; Aldredge TL; Stahl CA; Boggess M; Box-Steffensmeier JM
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20374749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market.
    McCarthy M; O'Reilly S; Cotter L; de Boer M
    Appetite; 2004 Aug; 43(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 15262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Willingness-to-accept and purchase genetically modified rice with high folate content in Shanxi Province, China.
    De Steur H; Gellynck X; Storozhenko S; Liqun G; Lambert W; Van Der Straeten D; Viaene J
    Appetite; 2010 Feb; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 19815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding apple consumers' expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study.
    Galmarini MV; Symoneaux R; Chollet S; Zamora MC
    Appetite; 2013 Mar; 62():27-36. PubMed ID: 23186695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Consumer perception of marbling and beef quality during purchase and consumer preferences for degree of doneness.
    Benli H; Yildiz DG
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 37170519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impressions and purchasing intentions of Japanese consumers regarding pork produced by 'Ecofeed,' a trademark of food-waste or food co-product animal feed certified by the Japanese government.
    Sasaki K; Aizaki H; Motoyama M; Ohmori H; Kawashima T
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Feb; 82(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 21269377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.
    Lăzăroiu G; Neguriţă O; Grecu I; Grecu G; Mitran PC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():890. PubMed ID: 32499740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Determinants of intention to reduce salt intake and willingness to purchase salt-reduced food products: Evidence from a web survey.
    Mørk T; Lähteenmäki L; Grunert KG
    Appetite; 2019 Aug; 139():110-118. PubMed ID: 31034859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How product trial changes quality perception of four new processed beef products.
    Saeed F; Grunert KG; Therkildsen M
    Meat Sci; 2013 Jan; 93(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22959402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. What is pork and poultry meat quality?
    Aumaitre AL; Laplace JP
    Forum Nutr; 2003; 56():323-7. PubMed ID: 15806920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Consumers' purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices.
    Hjelmar U
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21192997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Consumer expectations concerning the quality of food from animals].
    Pudel V
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Jul; 101(7):255-8. PubMed ID: 7924957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.