These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23273488)

  • 1. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of autoclaving on the fracture torque of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 21367824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
    Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage.
    Francioli D; Ruggiero G; Giorgetti R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 20974446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.
    Hosein YK; Smith A; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e57-64. PubMed ID: 27183083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Chiqueto K; Garib DG; Janson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e181-92. PubMed ID: 21967956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants.
    Whang CZ; Bister D; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-implant behavior to shear tensile forces in the porcine mandible.
    Edwards CW; Mah JK
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 21491003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.