These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23273729)

  • 1. Relationship of forces acting on implant rods and degree of scoliosis correction.
    Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Fujisaki K; Abe Y; Ito M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Feb; 28(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 23273729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrective force analysis for scoliosis from implant rod deformation.
    Salmingo R; Tadano S; Fujisaki K; Abe Y; Ito M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 22321374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of implant rod curvature on sagittal correction of scoliosis deformity.
    Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Abe Y; Ito M
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1432-9. PubMed ID: 24275616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does differential rod contouring contribute to 3-dimensional correction and affect the bone-screw forces in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation?
    Wang X; Boyer L; Le Naveaux F; Schwend RM; Aubin CE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Nov; 39():115-121. PubMed ID: 27750078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative implant rod three-dimensional geometry measured by dual camera system during scoliosis surgery.
    Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Abe Y; Ito M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 27175467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple method for in vivo measurement of implant rod three-dimensional geometry during scoliosis surgery.
    Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Fujisaki K; Abe Y; Ito M
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):054502. PubMed ID: 22757497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does implant distribution affect 3D correction and bone-screw forces in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal instrumentation?
    Le Navéaux F; Larson AN; Labelle H; Wang X; Aubin CÉ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Nov; 39():25-31. PubMed ID: 27639485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A finite element study on intra-operative corrective forces and evaluation of screw density in scoliosis surgeries.
    Musapoor A; Nikkhoo M; Haghpanahi M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Dec; 232(12):1245-1254. PubMed ID: 30453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Comparison of the Load-Sharing Capacity of High and Low Implant Density Constructs With Three Types of Pedicle Screws for the Instrumentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Clin J; Le Navéaux F; Driscoll M; Mac-Thiong JM; Labelle H; Parent S; Shah SA; Lonner BS; Newton PO; Serhan H
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 30587316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different surgical strategies on screw forces after correction of scoliosis with a VDS implant.
    Rohlmann A; Richter M; Zander T; Klöckner C; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Apr; 15(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 15912346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual and single memory rod construct comparison in an animal study.
    Newton PO; Farnsworth CL; Upasani VV; Chambers R; Yoon SH; Firkins P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E904-13. PubMed ID: 21217429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of vertebral derotation techniques for the surgical correction of thoracic scoliosis. A numerical study through case simulations and a sensitivity analysis.
    Martino J; Aubin CE; Labelle H; Wang X; Parent S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):E73-83. PubMed ID: 23124259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-operative measurement of applied forces during anterior scoliosis correction.
    Fairhurst H; Little JP; Adam CJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Dec; 40():68-73. PubMed ID: 27825053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A finite element analysis of different pedicle screw placement strategies for treatment of Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: which is better?
    Chen K; Zhao J; Zhao Y; Yang C; Li M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):270-277. PubMed ID: 32996329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Main thoracic curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: association of higher rod stiffness and concave-side pedicle screw density with improvement in sagittal thoracic kyphosis restoration.
    Liu H; Li Z; Li S; Zhang K; Yang H; Wang J; Li X; Zheng Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 25525960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors.
    Clements DH; Betz RR; Newton PO; Rohmiller M; Marks MC; Bastrom T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2147-50. PubMed ID: 19752700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertebral coplanar alignment: a standardized technique for three dimensional correction in scoliosis surgery: technical description and preliminary results in Lenke type 1 curves.
    Vallespir GP; Flores JB; Trigueros IS; Sierra EH; Fernández PD; Olaverri JC; Alonso MG; Galea RR; Francisco AP; Rodríguez de Paz B; Carbonell PG; Thomas JV; López JL; Paulino JI; Pitarque CB; García OR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1588-97. PubMed ID: 18552675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-density versus high-density thoracic pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do more screws lead to a better outcome?
    Bharucha NJ; Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Kean KE; Trobisch PD
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 22901787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 17712575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.