These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23274285)

  • 1. Goodness-of-fit tests for the frailty distribution in proportional hazards models with shared frailty.
    Geerdens C; Claeskens G; Janssen P
    Biostatistics; 2013 Jul; 14(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 23274285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penalized partial likelihood for frailties and smoothing splines in time to first insemination models for dairy cows.
    Duchateau L; Janssen P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 15339282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic frailty models based on compound birth-death processes.
    Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jul; 16(3):550-64. PubMed ID: 25681608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a contract breeding management program in selected Ohio dairy herds with event-time analysis II. Parametric frailty models.
    Meadows C; Rajala-Schultz PJ; Frazer GS; Phillips G; Meiring RW; Hoblet KH
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Jul; 80(2-3):89-102. PubMed ID: 17241680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On robustness of marginal regression coefficient estimates and hazard functions in multivariate survival analysis of family data when the frailty distribution is mis-specified.
    Hsu L; Gorfine M; Malone K
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4657-78. PubMed ID: 17348081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A joint frailty model to estimate the recurrence process and the disease-specific mortality process without needing the cause of death.
    Belot A; Rondeau V; Remontet L; Giorgi R;
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3147-66. PubMed ID: 24639014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goodness-of-fit tests in proportional hazards models with random effects.
    González-Manteiga W; Martínez-Miranda MD; Van Keilegom I
    Biom J; 2023 Jan; 65(1):e2000353. PubMed ID: 35790474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dispersion frailty models and HGLMs.
    Noh M; Ha ID; Lee Y
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1341-54. PubMed ID: 16217839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlated time to event data: Modeling repeated clinical mastitis data from dairy cattle in New York State.
    Schukken YH; Bar D; Hertl J; Gröhn YT
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):150-6. PubMed ID: 21035216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian semiparametric frailty selection in multivariate event time data.
    Cai B
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 20358551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of variance in Cox's regression model with shared gamma frailties.
    Andersen PK; Klein JP; Knudsen KM; Tabanera y Palacios R
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1475-84. PubMed ID: 9423262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing multivariate survival data using composite likelihood and flexible parametric modeling of the hazard functions.
    Nielsen J; Parner ET
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2126-36. PubMed ID: 20809537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data.
    Shih JH; Louis TA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1995; 1(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 9385102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian semiparametric dynamic frailty models for multiple event time data.
    Pennell ML; Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 17156278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian cure rate frailty models with application to a root canal therapy study.
    Yin G
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):552-8. PubMed ID: 16011704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of different bivariate correlated frailty models and estimation strategies.
    Wienke A; Arbeev KG; Locatelli I; Yashin AI
    Math Biosci; 2005 Nov; 198(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16185720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared frailty models for recurrent events and a terminal event.
    Liu L; Wolfe RA; Huang X
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):747-56. PubMed ID: 15339298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonproportional hazards and unobserved heterogeneity in clustered survival data: When can we tell the difference?
    Balan TA; Putter H
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3405-3420. PubMed ID: 31050028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation and variable selection via frailty models with penalized likelihood.
    Androulakis E; Koukouvinos C; Vonta F
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2223-39. PubMed ID: 22419584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.