These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23274371)

  • 1. Readability of "Dear Patient" device advisory notification letters created by a device manufacturer.
    Mueller LA; Sharma A; Ottenberg AL; Mueller PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Apr; 10(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 23274371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Density Notification Letters and Websites: Are They Too "Dense"?
    Saraiya A; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 May; 16(5):717-723. PubMed ID: 30686686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Device advisory letters: readability and comprehension, patient-centered outcomes not to be "misunderstood".
    Kim MH
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Apr; 10(4):508-9. PubMed ID: 23313800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices who received advisory warnings.
    Ottenberg AL; Mueller LA; Mueller PS
    Heart Lung; 2013; 42(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 23305915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
    Wilson M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.
    Williamson JM; Martin AG
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 64(13):1824-31. PubMed ID: 21070533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
    Paasche-Orlow MK; Taylor HA; Brancati FL
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Feb; 348(8):721-6. PubMed ID: 12594317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography result notification letters: are they easy to read and understand?
    Marcus EN; Sanders LM; Pereyra M; Del Toro Y; Romilly AP; Yepes M; Hooper MW; Jones BA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Apr; 20(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 21428738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Related to Parathyroid Surgery.
    Patel CR; Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2015 Jul; 124(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 25593212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them?
    Todhunter SL; Clamp PJ; Gillett S; Pothier DD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Mar; 124(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 19954560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.