241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23274619)
1. Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.
Buléon C; Parienti JJ; Lesage A; Grandin W; Pouliquen E; Flais F; Simonet T; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 23274619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.
Jabre P; Leroux B; Brohon S; Penet C; Lockey D; Adnet F; Margenet A; Marty J; Combes X
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 50(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 17583382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study.
Amour J; Le Manach YL; Borel M; Lenfant F; Nicolas-Robin A; Carillion A; Ripart J; Riou B; Langeron O
Anesthesiology; 2010 Feb; 112(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 20098134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laryngoscope plastic blades in scheduled general anesthesia patients: a comparative randomized study.
Galinski M; Catineau J; Rayeh F; Muret J; Ciebiera JP; Plantevin F; Foucrier A; Tual L; Combes X; Adnet F
J Clin Anesth; 2011 Mar; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 21377073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Out-of-hospital tracheal intubation with single-use versus reusable metal laryngoscope blades: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Jabre P; Galinski M; Ricard-Hibon A; Devaud ML; Ruscev M; Kulstad E; Vicaut E; Adnet F; Margenet A; Marty J; Combes X
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Mar; 57(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 21129822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.
Amour J; Marmion F; Birenbaum A; Nicolas-Robin A; Coriat P; Riou B; Langeron O
Anesthesiology; 2006 Jan; 104(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16394691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation: a randomised clinical trial.
Wasem S; Lazarus M; Hain J; Festl J; Kranke P; Roewer N; Lange M; Smul TM
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 23442315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disposable stainless steel vs plastic laryngoscope blades among paramedics.
Dos Santos FD; Schnakofsky R; Cascio A; Liu J; Merlin MA
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 29(6):590-3. PubMed ID: 20825833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disposable laryngoscope blades do not interfere with ease of intubation in scheduled general anaesthesia patients.
Galinski M; Adnet F; Tran D; Karyo Z; Quintard H; Delettre D; Lebail E; Guignard B; Lebrault C; Chauvin M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Sep; 20(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 12974595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-use versus reusable metallic laryngoscopes for non-emergent intubation: A retrospective review of 72,672 intubations.
Chang DR; Burnett GW; Chiu S; Ouyang Y; Lin HM; Hyman JB
J Clin Anesth; 2023 Oct; 89():111187. PubMed ID: 37339555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
Ali QE; Das B; Amir SH; Siddiqui OA; Jamil S
J Clin Anesth; 2014 May; 26(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 24809787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades.
Evans A; Vaughan RS; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh J; Wilkes AR
Anaesthesia; 2003 Sep; 58(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 12911359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Metal and Plastic Disposable Laryngoscope Blade with Reusable Macintosh Blade in Difficult and Inhalation Injury Airway Scenario: A Manikin Study.
Moritz A; Heinrich S; Irouschek A; Birkholz T; Prottengeier J; Schmidt J
J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 52(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27693076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.
Gu Y; Robert J; Kovacs G; Milne AD; Morris I; Hung O; MacQuarrie K; Mackinnon S; Adam Law J
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 63(8):928-37. PubMed ID: 27090535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nasotracheal intubation using the Blind Intubation Device in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Sun Y; Liu JX; Zhu YS; Xu H; Huang Y; Jiang H
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 21885980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of 20 laryngoscope blades using an intubating manikin: visual analogue scores and forces exerted during laryngoscopy.
Rassam S; Wilkes AR; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh JS
Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 15766342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison between the Airtraq, X-Lite, and direct laryngoscopes for thyroid surgery: a randomized clinical trial].
Bensghir M; Chouikh C; Bouhabba N; Fjjouji S; Kasouati J; Azendour H; Kamili ND
Can J Anaesth; 2013 Apr; 60(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 23264012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
